Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prince And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 7984 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7984 P&H
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Prince And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 16 April, 2024

            297                                                    2024:PHHC:051227
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                     AT CHANDIGARH
                                                                        CRM-M-9263-2024
                                                          Date of Decision: April 16, 2024

            PRINCE AND ANR                                                 ........Petitioners
                                 Versus
            STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR                                       ........Respondents

            CORAM:             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

            Present:Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioners.
                    Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.
                    Mr. Kashish Sahni, Advocate for respondent No.2.
                                         ****
            HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the

petitioners pray for quashing of case bearing FIR No.142 dated

08.12.2023 registered under Section 307 and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms

Act, 1959 at P.S. D Division, District Police Commissionerate Amritsar

along with all consequential proceedings arising out of the same on

the basis of compromise dated 16.01.2024.

2. As per allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners fired a

gunshot upon complaint-respondent No.2 which hit on his left thigh.

3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated

21.02.2024 directed the parties to appear before trial Court for getting their

statements recorded as regards the veracity of the compromise arrived at

between them.

4. In pursuance to the order dated 21.02.2024, a report dated

15.03.2024 has been received from the concerned Court, stating that the

compromise in the present case is genuine and voluntary.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that once, a

compromise has been arrived at between the parties without any pressure

and respondent No.2 and has no objection as regards quashing of FIR as

well as all other subsequent proceedings arising out of the same against

the petitioners; the dispute purely personal in nature, there does not

appear to be any impediment as regards quashing of present FIR. He also

submits that even, in order to maintain peace and harmony between the

parties, particularly under the circumstances wherein the alleged offences

have no societal interest involved, it would be appropriate to render

complete quietus to the aforementioned dispute by quashing the FIR on

the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

6. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that

allegations in the present FIR are of serious nature and he opposes the

prayer made in the petition.

7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone

through the records including the report dated 15.03.2024. Though, the

present case involves fire-arm injury upon person of complainant,

however, the same is on non-vital part of body besides the parties to the

litigation are resident of nearby vicinity. The parties having settled their

dispute so as to live in peace in future, no useful purpose would be

served by proceeding further with the criminal proceedings. In the light

of above developments, no cause remains for the trial Court to invest

further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR. The compromise in

question is even found to be fully in consonance with the directions

issued by this Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab

2007(3) RCR(Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs.

State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".

8. Thus, in view of the aforesaid report, accompanied by

statements of both the parties as well as keeping in mind the law laid

down in the aforementioned judgments, the petition is allowed and FIR

No. 142 dated 08.12.2023 registered under Section 307 and Sections 25

and 27 of Arms Act, 1959 at P.S. D Division, District Police

Commissionerate Amritsar along with all consequential proceeding

arising therefrom, are hereby quashed.

9. The aforesaid order shall, however, be subject to payment

of Costs of Rs.20,000/- to be deposited with Government Medical

Hospital, Amritsar within a period of two weeks from today. The

petitioner volunteers to deliver two stretchers to the Government

Medical hospital and receipt along with photographs in this regard be

produced within a period of 15 days from today.





            16.04.2024                                       (HARKESH MANUJA)
            Tejwinder                                             JUDGE
                                   Whether speaking/reasoned   Yes/No
                                      Whether Reportable       Yes/No








 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter