Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7943 P&H
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050669
CWP No.11438 of 2021 (O&M) 1
2024:PHHC:050669
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
238
CWP No.11438 of 2021 (O&M)
Date of decision: 16.04.2024
Harish Kumar and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, Punjab
for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate for respondent No.5.
NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in this writ petition filed by the petitioner under
Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in
the nature of certiorari, for quashing the memo dated 29.04.2010
(Annexure P-5) vide which the benefit of Assured Career Progression
Scheme (ACP) as formulated vide Policy Circular dated 03.11.2006
(Annexure P-4) has been declined to the category of Junior
Engineers/Assistant Engineers.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of
the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment titled as "Jaswinder
Singh Bedi and others vs State of Punjab and others", passed in CWP
No.16446 of 2010, decided on 20.05.2013 (Annexure P-6) and the
judgment titled as "State of Punjab vs Jaswinder Singh Bedi and
others", passed in LPA No.244 of 2014, decided on 19.12.2014
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050669
2024:PHHC:050669
(Annexure P-7). He further submits that for claiming the relief of
Assured Career Progression on completion of 04/09/14 years of service,
the petitioners have served a legal notice dated 25.03.2021 (Annexure
P-9), which has not been responded to by the respondents till date and
he would be satisfied if their claim so made in the legal notice is
considered and decided by the respondents in a time bound manner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to
the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone
through the record of the case.
5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or
the claim being made by the petitioners in the present petition,
respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the claim made by
the petitioners in the legal notice dated 25.03.2021 (Annexure P-9), in
accordance with law, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 03
months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. The petition stands disposed of.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE
16.04.2024
yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!