Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravinder Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 7936 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7936 P&H
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ravinder Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 16 April, 2024

Author: Suvir Sehgal

Bench: Suvir Sehgal

                                    Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050831



                                                              2024:PHHC:050831

CWP-7302-2024 (O&M)                         -1-



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                              CHANDIGARH
(106)
                                                      CWP-7302-2024 (O&M)
                                                  Date of decision:- 16.04.2024
Ravinder Kumar                                                  ...Petitioner
                              Versus
State of Haryana and others                                     ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Present: Ms. Sonia G.Singh Samber, Advocate, for the petitioner.
                 ...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)

CM-5670-CWP-2024

Application is allowed as prayed for.

Additional Affidavit of the petitioner as well as Annexures P-11

and P-12, are taken on record.

CWP-7302-2024

1. By way of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of

a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 21.01.2022,

Annexure P-7, passed by respondent No.3, whereby, his Firearm Licence

has been cancelled, as well as order dated 18.05.2022, Annexure P-9,

passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby, appeal preferred by the

petitioner has been dismissed. Another prayer has also been made for

issuance of provisional licence to the petitioner.



                                   1 of 3

                                    Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050831



                                                             2024:PHHC:050831

CWP-7302-2024 (O&M)                        -2-



2. Counsel for the petitioner urges that petitioner is a businessman

and has to travel with cash at odd times. She submits that petitioner is in

the need of a firearm for his safety and the safety of his employees. She

submits that petitioner was issued a Firearm Licence in the year 2007,

which was renewed from time to time. She submits that the petitioner was

named as an accused in FIR No.371 dated 22.09.2021, lodged under

Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506, IPC, and Section 27 of the Arms

Act, 1959, at Police Station Nissing, District Karnal, Annexure P-1. After

serving a show cause notice, impugned order, Annexure P-7, respondent

No.3 cancelled his Licence. Counsel submits that the criminal case was

settled, but ignoring this fact, Appellate Authority vide impugned order,

Annexure P-9, dismissed the appeal. By making a reference to the

additional affidavit, which has been taken on record, today, she submits

that the petitioner's weapon was snatched by one Lakhwinder Singh,

which is now deposited with the Police Station Nissing, vide Recovery

Memo, Annexure P-11. It is her argument that after passing of the

impugned orders by the Authorities, FIR has been quashed by order dated

02.11.2023, Annexure P-3, passed by this Court on the basis of a

settlement between the parties.

3. Issue notice to the respondents.

4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Aman Bahri, Additional Advocate

General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf. State counsel could not

dispute that FIR, Annexure P-1, has been quashed after passing of the

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050831

2024:PHHC:050831

CWP-7302-2024 (O&M) -3-

impugned appellate order.

5. I have heard counsel for the parties and considered their

respective submissions.

6. The sole ground for cancellation of the Fire Arms Licence was

involvement of the petitioner in a criminal case. However, criminal case

has now been quashed by this Court, vide judgment, Annexure P-3, on the

basis of a compromise between the parties. As the sole ground, on which,

Licence was cancelled, no longer exists, this Court is of the view that the

matter deserves to be re-examined by the Authorities in the light of the

subsequent development.

7. Accordingly, petition is allowed. Annexures P-7 and P-9 are

quashed. Matter is remitted to respondent No.3 (District Magistrate,

Karnal), who shall pass a fresh order after hearing the parties within a

period of four months in light of the subsequent development.

8. It is clarified that Fire Arms Licence issued to the petitioner shall

remain suspended/cancelled till the time respondent No.3 takes a final

decision and would be subject to the final outcome of the proceedings

before respondent No.3.



                                                 (SUVIR SEHGAL)
                                                      JUDGE
16.04.2024
Pardeep

        Whether Speaking/Reasoned                 Yes/No
        Whether Reportable                        Yes/No


                                  3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter