Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bikramjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 7785 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7785 P&H
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Bikramjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 15 April, 2024

Author: Manjari Nehru Kaul

Bench: Manjari Nehru Kaul

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050287




                                     2024 : PHHC : 050287
                                                      123
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                     AT CHANDIGARH

                     CRM-M No.17970 of 2024
                   Date of decision: 15th April, 2024

Bikramjit Singh & others
                                                              ... Petitioners
                                   Versus
State of Punjab & another
                                                            ... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:    Ms. Gurmeet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482

Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.138 dated 13.07.2016 (Annexure P-1)

under Sections 307, 506, 148, 149 of the IPC and sections 25/27 of the

Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station City Kharar, District SAS

Nagar Mohali along with all consequential proceedings arising

therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.04.2024 (Annexure P-

2) effected between the parties.

2. Learned counsel submits that no doubt offences alleged are

under Section 307 IPC as well as under the Arms Act, 1959, however,

it is a case of no injury and hence, in the interest of justice, the FIR in

question be quashed as further proceedings would serve no useful

purpose.

3. Notice of motion.

1 of 5

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050287

CRM-M No.17970 of 2024 2024 : PHHC : 050287

4. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. Dy. Advocate General, Punjab accepts

notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Rajesh Duhan, Advocate puts in

appearance and files his power of attorney on behalf of respondent

No.2.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

relevant material on record.

6. It will be apposite to reproduce the contents of the FIR in

question, which reads thus:-

"Statements of Bhawanjit Singh @ bhawan, S/o Late Mohan Singh, Caste Jaat, R/o Village Khuni Majra, Police Station Sadar Kharar, District SAS Nagar, aged about 21 years, Mobile No. 84277-49353, State that I am resident of the above address and I am doing the work of agriculture. My father was passed away. We are two brothers I am elder and my younger brother is Anmolpreet Singh studying in 11th class in Khalsa Senior School Kharar, my brother Anmolpreet Singh with his friend was went to his aunt's house, on his car bearing No. HP12-1511 on 12.11.2016, when they reached near Samrala, back to Bypass road Morinda Ghandua side, another vehicle numbered PB- 65R-9870 was parked in front of their car. Happy, Billa, Jassa and 2/3 other boys were in it and they were beaten up by these person. In this regard, I wanted to talk to Happy and others but they did not meet me and around 7:30 PM I was called by Harinder Singh @ Honey and they asked me to come to the back side of Khooni Majra College, So me and my friend Rupinder Singh C Rupi S/o Kulbir Singh, caste Jaat, on our car Safari Number HP12-1511 and went to the back side of Khooni Majra College to talk. I left

2 of 5

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050287

CRM-M No.17970 of 2024 2024 : PHHC : 050287

switched on the lights of the car and I just came out of the car. On car Endevor bearing number PB65-R-9870, one Balero and one more car was parked there, Vikramjit Singh @ Vicky S/o Jaswinder Singh, Jaat, R/o Badanpur, Manpreet Singh R/o Jandpur, Gurinder Singh @ Billa and Harinder Singh @ Honey S/o Sant Singh, R/o Jhugia and Aman R/O Chajju Majra were standing next to the cars. Aman saw me and raised a lalkara that we will not let you go. Along with the lalkara, others started shouting louldly and they all started abusing us. Aman fired on us with his weapon with the intension of killing me, but I was saved along with the above said persons, Jassa was also with them, who is residing "Kharar City" I ran into the car, started the car and saved myself, when I tried to ran away from the spot then Aman again fired another shot at me and others who were present there, threw stones at me, and used to threaten to kill. Sandeep was still in the car. So we quickly drove the car away and saved our lives, after that I did not step out of my house. Today I was coming with my mother to inform you and you met me on the way at Ladra Raod, I-point, Badala. The statement got recorded to you and action should be taken against Vikramjit Singh @ Vicky, Manpreet Singh @ nandi, Gurinder Singh @ Billa, Harinder Singh @ Honey, Aman Chajja Majra, and Jassa Sd/- Bhawanpreet Singh. Testified by Jasbir Kaur, verifying by ASI Deep Singh, Police Station City Kharar."

7. A perusal of the FIR in question prima facie reveals that it

was a premeditated attack which was carried out by the accused

petitioners upon the complainant; the complainant along with his friend

had been called to the spot by the accused and thereafter, without any

3 of 5

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050287

CRM-M No.17970 of 2024 2024 : PHHC : 050287

provocation, all the accused, who were armed with fire-arms, fired

towards the complainant; the complainant quickly got inside his vehicle

and fled from the spot. The accused, thereafter, kept pelting stones

towards the vehicle of the complainant. Furthermore, it needs to be

emphasized that an offence under the Arms Act, 1959 is always

registered with the sanction of the District Magistrate, who too is not a

party to the instant petition, and on this ground as well, the criminal

proceedings against the petitioners cannot be quashed in the instant

case.

8. In view of the peculiar facts of the present case, it is

apparent that the occurrence in question was a premeditated one and

without any provocation, thereby affecting the society at large, not just

the Complainant as an individual. It is, therefore, the duty of the State

to bring to book such offenders of crimes against society. The afore-

referred position has been reiterated time and again by Hon'ble the

Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments including 'State of M.P. vs.

Laxmi Narayan' (2019) 5 SCC 688, stating that certain offences, such

as offences under Section 307 IPC and/or the Arms Act, 1959 etc. fall

within the category of heinous and serious offences and therefore, are

to be treated as crimes against society and not against the individual

alone. Thus, criminal proceedings for the offence under Section 307

IPC of and/or the Arms Act, etc. which make a serious impact on the

society cannot be quashed in exercise of powers under Section 482 of

4 of 5

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:050287

CRM-M No.17970 of 2024 2024 : PHHC : 050287

the Code, on the ground that the parties have resolved their entire

dispute amongst themselves.

9. In the facts and circumstances as enumerated hereinabove,

the petition stands dismissed.





                                          (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)
                                                 JUDGE
April 15, 2024
rps
             Whether speaking/reasoned                 Yes/No
             Whether reportable                        Yes/No




                                 5 of 5

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter