Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19790 P&H
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
306
2023:PHHC:144784
CRM-M-18489-2023
Date of decision: November 15th, 2023
M/s Punnagai and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Jangra, Advocate
for the petitioner.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.2123 dated 12.12.2022 (Annexure P-2)
under Section 174-A of the IPC registered at Police Station Shivaji
Nagar, Gurgaon and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has drawn
the attention of this Court to order dated 17.05.2023, wherein it stands
reflected that in view of a statement made by the AR for the
complainant, the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'the NI Act') was dismissed as
withdrawn on the basis of a compromise. A prayer, therefore, has been
made that in the aforementioned facts and circumstances, no purpose
would be served by prosecuting the petitioner under Section 174-A
IPC. In support of his submissions, learned counsel has placed reliance
upon the judgment of this Court in Sher Singh vs. State of Haryana
(CRM-M-11846-2023) decided on 09.03.2023 wherein in identical
facts and circumstances, the FIR registered under Section 174-A of the PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.11.15 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.
Chandigarh
IPC against the petitioner was quashed.
3. Notice of motion.
4. On asking of the Court, Ms. Jasleen Chahal,
Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of
respondent No.1-State.
5. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer made by the
counsel opposite and contended that it was evident that the petitioner
had intentionally not appeared during the proceedings before the Court
below and hence, the prayer of the petitioners deserved to be declined.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
relevant material on record.
7. The petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender in a
complaint case under Section 138 of the NI Act. Admittedly, the said
complaint was withdrawn after the parties arrived at a compromise.
Hence, continuation of criminal proceedings for offence under Section
174-A of the IPC would serve no useful purpose.
8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR
registered under Section 174-A of the IPC and all consequential
proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
November 15th, 2023 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)
Puneet JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : No
PUNEET SACHDEVA
2023.11.15 14:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document.
Chandigarh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!