Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19186 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140777
2023:PHHC:140777
125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-24823-2023
Date of Decision: 06.11.2023
Manphool Singh ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others .......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr. Dhirinder Kamal Saldi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the order dated
09.02.2023 (Annexure P-11) passed by respondent No.1, whereby, the
application for staying the order dated 23.01.2023 passed by respondent No.2
was dismissed and order dated 23.01.2023 (Annexure P-10) passed by
respondent No.2.
It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
petitioner is the elected Sarpanch of the village and he was illegally suspended
from the post vide order dated 23.01.2023. He submits that against the
suspension order, the petitioner filed an appeal and the same is pending
consideration before respondent No.1. He submits that as the appeal is not being
heard, the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing CWP-12243-2023,
which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 31.05.2023 with a
direction that the appeal filed by the petitioner be decided within three weeks
from 01.06.2023. He submits that despite the order passed, the appeal has not
been decided and the stay application filed by the petitioner is already declined
by way of the impugned order dated 09.02.2023. He submits that the petitioner
having no other alternative option, filed contempt petition, which is pending for
12.02.2024. He submits that there is no actual date given in the appeal and the
term of the petitioner who is an elected Sarpanch, is going to expire on
31.12.2023. It is submitted that the appeal is a substantial right granted by the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140777
CWP-24823-2023 -2- 2023:PHHC:140777
legislature but the same is being defeated. He has placed reliance upon the
judgment of Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Inderjit Singh vs. State of
Punjab, 2013(3) RCR (Civil) 287 and submits that long suspension of an elected
representative is neither in the interest of Panchayati Raj democracy nor
justified in the facts and circumstances of the case. He further submits that in
the facts and circumstances of the case, declining of stay application by virtue
of the impugned order, deserves to be set aside when there are no chances of
appeal being heard by respondent No.1.
Notice of motion.
Ms. Akshita Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts
notice on behalf of the respondent-State. She has submitted that respondent
No.1 has been assigned the charge for hearing the appeal, however, there is no
actual date given in the appeal for hearing.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the
record, it is apparent that the petitioner was suspended vide order dated
23.01.2023. The appeal filed by him admittedly is pending adjudication before
the Appellate Court. Further there is no denial to the fact that the term of the
petitioner is going to expire on 31.12.2023. In view of the same, the impugned
order dated 09.02.2023 is set aside and order dated 23.01.2023, suspending the
petitioner from the post of Sarpanch, would remain stayed till the decision of
the appeal by the competent authority.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ)
06.11.2023 JUDGE
sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140777
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!