Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19038 P&H
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140305
2023:PHHC:140305
CRM-M-43794-2023 -1-
201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-43794-2023
DECIDED ON: 03.11.2023
MOHAMAD DAUD .....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL.
Present: Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, D.A.G., Haryana.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J
1. This is the second petition moved under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") for the grant of regular bail to the
petitioner in FIR No.724 dated 30.12.2022 registered under Sections20,
20B(ii)(c), 58(2) and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act') at Police Station Ladwa, District Kurukshetra.
2. On 30.12.2022, upon receipt of a secret information, a police team
intercepted one Sandeep who was stated to be involved in selling of Charas
(Sulpha). Upon his personal search (after complying with the statutory
provisions), 1kg 150 grams of Charas was recovered. Upon interrogation, he
named one Harvinder Singh @ Golu as the person from whom he had purchased
the contraband. The said Harvinder Singh @ Golu was arrested who then named
one Aman. Upon arrest, Aman named the present petitioner. The present
petitioner was accordingly arrested on 16.01.2023 and is in custody since then.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has
been falsely implicated. It was contended that no recovery had been made from
the petitioner. It was further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since
16.01.2023; the petitioner was not named in the FIR; the petitioner was not
named even by the person who was arrested with the contraband and was
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140305
2023:PHHC:140305
nominated as an accused on the basis of a statement of a co-accused who himself
was not arrested from the spot; the petitioner had himself joined investigation but
was wrongly arrested by the Investigating Agency; final report under Section 173
Cr.P.C. was submitted on 19.06.2023; trial will still take a sufficiently long time
and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in
custody any longer. It was further contended that one more person namely Khalil
was also arrayed as an accused and the allegation was that the present petitioner
had purchased the contraband from him. The said Khalil moved a petition for
anticipatory bail before this Court and a Coordinate Bench has granted interim
protection in CRM-M-46301-2023 titled as 'Khalil Vs. State of Haryana'.
Reliance was also placed by learned counsel upon the judgment of the Hon'ble
Apex Court in the case of 'Tofan Singh Vs. State of Tamil Nadu', 2020 AIR
(Supreme Court) 5592.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel representing the State of
Haryana opposed the bail application stating that the petitioner is a habitual
offender. It was submitted that two other cases stand registered against the
petitioner under the NDPS Act out of which, in one case i.e. FIR No.293 dated
12.06.2007 registered under Section 18/20 of the NDPS Act, the petitioner was
convicted and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment of 13 years. It was
submitted that if the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to influence and
threaten the witnesses and may also abscond.
5. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the
parties. Admittedly, co-accused Sandeep was found in possession of Charas
weighing 1kg 150 grams and was accordingly arrested on 30.12.2022. On
successive disclosure statements by different co-accused i.e. Sandeep, Harvinder
Singh @ Golu and Aman, the present petitioner was nominated as an accused.
No recovery was made from him. He was arrested on 16.01.2023 and is
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140305
2023:PHHC:140305
undergoing incarceration since then. Admittedly, he has been arrayed as an
accused on the basis of the disclosure statement of a co-accused in pursuance to
which no recovery was made. More than nine months have elapsed. Final report
under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been submitted. Trial will still take a sufficiently
long time. The pendency of two other cases against the petitioner would not be
relevant for the purposes of grant of bail in the present case especially since the
recovery in the present case has not been made from the petitioner. Co-accused
Khalil, from whom the petitioner is stated to have purchased the contraband, has
already been granted interim protection by a Co-ordinate Bench in CRM-M-
46301-2023 titled as 'Khalil Vs. State of Haryana' and the same is now pending
for 06.11.2023. In the considered opinion of this Court, no further incarceration
is required to be undergone by the petitioner. The petitioner can be put to
stringent conditions but, in the considered opinion of this Court, his liberty
should not be curtailed any further.
In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the present
petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his
furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Chief
Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate Kurukshetra. However, nothing observed
hereinbefore shall be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
03.11.2023 JUDGE
Prince Chawla
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:140305
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!