Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 18955 P&H
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:139809
2023:PHHC:139809
150 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
ESA-51-2023 (O&M)
Date of decision: 02.11.2023
Saddam Hussain and others
....Appellants
Versus
Randhir Singh and others ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present:- Mr. Hardeep Singh Dhillon, Advocate for the appellants
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
The appellants herein are the objectors. They are the
children of the judgment debtor. They claim to be in possesison of
the property. A decree for possession, by way of specific
performance of the agreement to sell, has been passed against Salim,
on 19.07.2014, which, in appeal, was affirmed by the First Appellate
Court. The appellants have failed to establish any independent right
in the property.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, there is no ground
to interfere with the order passed by the Executing Court, while
dismissing the objection petition filed by the appellants.
Hence, dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are
also disposed of.
02.11.2023 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) rekha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:139809
1 of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!