Lokesh And Anr vs State Of Ut, Chandigarh And Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 1407 P&H

270

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                          AT CHANDIGARH

                                       CRM-M-34908-2022
                                       DECIDED ON: 23.01.2023

LOKESH AND ANR.
                                                    .....PETITIONERS

                                   VERSUS


STATE OF UT, CHANDIGARH AND ANR.
                                                     .....RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL.

Present:     Dr. Juhi Goel, Advocate
             for the petitioners.

Mr. Ankur Bali, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-U.T., Chandigarh.

None for respondent No.2.

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR

No.10, dated 17.07.2022 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 420, 419, 468, 471

and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Cyber

Crime, District Chandigarh, with all subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom, on the basis of compromise and affidavit (Annexures P-2 and P-3

respectively).

During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have

compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR.

Vide order dated 15.12.2022, parties were directed to appear

before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court and report with regard to the

genuineness of the compromise was called for.

1 of 3

The report dated 10.01.2023, has been received from learned

Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh, stating that the parties have entered

into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or

undue influence. There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.2,

which shows that he has no objection to the quashing of instant FIR.

Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State

of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, has held:-

"The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in noncompoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.

The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is to be exercised Ex-Debitia Justitia to prevent an abuse of process of Court. There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined para-meters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its inherent powers. It will always depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has no limits. However, the High Court will exercise it sparingly and with utmost care and caution. The exercise of power has to be with circumspection and restraint. The Court is a vital and an extra-ordinary effective instrument to maintain and control social order. The Courts play role of paramount importance in achieving peace, harmony and ever- lasting congeniality in society. Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a Court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or

2 of 3

would promote savagery."

The legal principles as laid down for quashing of the judgment

were also approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Gian

Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012) 10 SCC 303'.

Furthermore, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482

were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parbatbhai

Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of

Gujarat and another" (2017) 9 SCC 641'.

It is evident that in view of the amicable resolution of the issues

amongst the parties, no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the

proceedings. The furtherance of the proceedings is likely to be a waste of

judicial time and there appears to be no chances of conviction.

In view of above, FIR No.10, dated 17.07.2022 (Annexure P-1),

under Sections 420, 419, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,

registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Chandigarh, with all

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua the petitioners, on

the basis of compromise and affidavit (Annexures P-2 and P-3 respectively).

The present petition is hereby allowed.

                                                (SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
23.01.2023                                            JUDGE
Poonam Negi

Whether speaking/reasoned        Yes/No
Whether reportable               Yes/No




                                       3 of 3