Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1081 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023
CRM-2149-2023 in/and 1
CRM-M-29994-2022 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.128+290 CRM-2149-2023 in/and
CRM-M-29994-2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 18.01.2023
Gurwinder Singh .... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Harpreet Singh, Addl. A.G.Punjab.
Mr. L.S.Lakhanpal, Advocate for
Mr. K.S.Lakhanpal, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
***
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)
CRM-2149-2023
This is an application for placing on record the certified copy of
judgment and decree of divorce dated 04.11.2022 as Annexure P-3 and also
for grant of exemption from filing the typed copy of the same.
The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and
Annexure P-3 is taken on record.
CRM-M-29994-2022
The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
seeking quashing of FIR No.40 dated 01.03.2019, registered under Sections
498-A, 406, 506, 323 and 377 of IPC at Police Station Sadar Khanna,
1 of 3
CRM-M-29994-2022 (O&M)
District Khanna (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising
therefrom, in view of the compromise dated 22.04.2022 (Annexure P-2).
Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a
compromise, vide order dated 24.08.2022 of this Court, parties were directed
to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their
statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated
17.10.2022 has been received from Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Khanna, at
Flag 'A', stating that the compromise arrived at between the parties is
without any pressure, coercion or undue influence.
Learned State counsel and learned counsel appearing on behalf
of respondent No.2-complainant admit the factum of compromise and
submit that they have no objection to quashing of the FIR on that basis.
Perusal of the aforesaid report establishes that the parties have
amicably settled their dispute, and continuance of criminal prosecution in
such a situation will be an exercise in futility, as the chances of ultimate
conviction are bleak. The power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised
in such matters. It has been held by Supreme Court of India in cases Gian
Singh v. State of Punjab and another 2012(10) SCC 303 and Narinder Singh
and others v. State of Punjab and another 2014(6) SCC 466 that criminal
cases having overwhelmingly civil character, particularly those arising out of
commercial transactions or matrimonial relationships or family disputes,
should be quashed when the parties have resolved their disputes among
themselves in a bona fide manner.
Consequently, this petition is allowed. FIR No.40 dated
01.03.2019, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, 323 and 377 of IPC
2 of 3
CRM-M-29994-2022 (O&M)
at Police Station Sadar Khanna, District Khanna and all subsequent
proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
18.01.2023
Maninder
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!