Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3878 P&H
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023
2023:PHHC:049854
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
119
CRWP-3419-2023
Decided on : 12.04.2023
Neha and another
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Ms. Suman Kumari, Advocate
for the petitioners.
****
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to official respondents
No.2 & 3, to provide protection of lives and liberty of the petitioners, who
have married against the wishes of private respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1
- Neha, aged 21 years & 7 months and petitioner No.2 - Gurwinder Kumar,
aged 24 years 2 months, have solemnized marriage on 06.04.2023, against
the wishes of their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 7.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that it is the first
marriage of both the petitioners. It has been submitted that the private
respondents are threatening to interfere in the matrimonial life of the
petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking protection in that regard and
have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. They have
also submitted a representation dated 07.04.2023 (Annexure P-4), to
respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, wherein, they have
expressed their apprehension.
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.12 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment 2023:PHHC:049854
3. Notice of motion.
4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG,
Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (State).
5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a
direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, to look
into the representation dated 07.04.2023 (Annexure P-4), qua threat
perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in
accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are
not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.
6. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to
have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or
criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with
law.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE April 12, 2023 k.nain
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.12 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!