Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15252 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2022
118.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-27108-2022
Date of Decision: 29.11.2022
RAJINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS .... Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:- Mr. Baljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
----
JAISHREE THAKUR.J (Oral)
This is a petition that has been filed under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or
direction, including a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the
respondents to release full amount deposited by the petitioners towards
Contributory Provident Fund along with 8.1% interest accrued thereon, as
the same benefit has been granted by this Court to the similarly situated
persons vide judgment dated 30.03.2022 passed in CWP No.35361 of 2019
titled as Constable Bikramjit Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and
others (Annexure P-5).
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would contend
that in this regard, the petitioners have already served a legal notice dated
27.07.2022 (Annexure P-6) upon respondent No.2, but till date, no decision
has been taken thereon. He would submit that at this stage, the petitioners
1 of 2
would be satisfied in case their legal notice is decided, in accordance with
law, in a time bound manner.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Ms. Deepali Puri, Additional
Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf
of the respondents.
Let sufficient number of copies of complete paper book be
supplied to her during the course of day.
Without commenting on merits of the case and keeping in view
the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide legal notice dated
27.07.2022 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners within a period of four months
from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with
law and convey the decision to the petitioners. In case of failure to do so, the
officer responsible for the lapse would be liable to costs of Rs.20,000/- from
his personal pocket, to be deposited with the Punjab and Haryana High Court
Advocates Welfare Fund.
(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE 29.11.2022 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!