Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1845 P&H
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2022
106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR-4220-2016 (O&M)
Date of decision: 21.03.2022
Malkit Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
M/s Amandeep and Company and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Tekwinder Singh Rai, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the respondents
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
Through this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner (judgment debtor) prays for setting
aside of the order dated 12.05.2016 as well as order dated 21.03.2016.
An application under Order 9 Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,
filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by both the courts below. It is
undisputed that the petitioner entered appearance on 09.03.2007 through
his counsel in a suit for grant of decree of recovery. He was proceeded
ex parte on 06.10.2007. The suit was decreed on 08.06.2011. The
petitioner claims that he came to know of the ex parte judgment and
decree on 09.04.2015 and the application under Order 9 Rule 13 of Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed on 02.07.2015. No application for
condoning the delay has been filed. Furthermore, there is no explanation
as to what steps were taken by the petitioner after engaging the counsel
on 09.03.2017. There is no explanation for a period of nearly 8 ½ years.
In these circumstances, no ground to interfere with the concurrent orders
1 of 2
passed by the courts below is made out.
Hence, dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
21.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
rekha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!