Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1326 P&H
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-902-2020 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-08.03.2022
MEETU NANDA
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
M/S AMBAY HANDICRAFTS AND ANR
... Respondent(s)
*****
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
*****
Present:- Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate
for the respondents.
*****
KARAMJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)
This order will dispose of the present criminal revision petition
filed by Meetu Nanda (accused/petitioner).
The brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.1
(complainant) filed criminal complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act (in short 'NI Act') against the petitioner regarding
dishonour of cheque worth `50,000/- bearing No.872309 dated 15.1.2017.
On completion of trial, the petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of NI
Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year
and to pay fine of `70,000/- which includes interest @ 9% per annum from
1 of 3
(2) CRR-902-2020 (O&M)
the date of issuance of cheque and `5,700/- litigation expenses and `5,000/-
Court fine. Out of total amount `65,000/- was directed to be paid to the
complainant as compensation under Section 357 Cr.P.C. and `5,000/- is to
be deposited as fine with the Court. In default of payment of fine the
accused was to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3
months vide judgment dated 5.2.2019 and order of sentence dated 6.2.2019
passed by Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat.
Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed criminal appeal against the
said judgment and order. After hearing both the parties, the Appellate Court
dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner vide judgment dated 16.3.2020.
Still being not satisfied, the petitioner has filed the present
revision petition.
Upon notice of motion, Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate presented
his power of attorney on behalf of respondents.
During the pendency of this revision petition, the matter was
referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Panipat, where the dispute
between the parties was amicably resolved.
Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate respondent No.1 has admitted the
fact of compromise which has been effected between the parties. He further
admitted that the settled amount as per said compromise has been received
by respondent No.1 from the petitioner. He has no objection, if the offence
punishable under Section 138 of NI Act is compounded.
The counsel for the petitioner produced copy of receipt No.3659
and submitted that the requisite compounding fee has been deposited by the
2 of 3
(3) CRR-902-2020 (O&M)
petitioner in compliance of order dated 20.12.2021 passed by the Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court. This fact has not been disputed by the counsel
for respondent No.1.
Thus it is clear that the parties have settled their dispute by way
of compromise and accordingly permission is hereby granted to the parties
to compound the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act.
Consequently, the present revision petition is allowed and
impugned judgments and orders passed by the Courts below are set aside.
The complaint filed by respondent No.1 under Section 138 Negotiable
Instruments Act is dismissed and the petitioner stands acquitted.
( KARAMJIT SINGH)
08.03.2022 JUDGE
Gaurav Sorot
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No
Whether reportable? Yes / No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!