Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7791 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2022
TA-200-2022 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
TA-200-2022 (O&M)
Date of decision: 26.07.2022
Sonia
....Petitioner
Vs.
Sachin Kumar
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Bharat Puri, Advocate
for the respondent.
*******
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the
respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending
before the Family Court, Jalandhar to the competent Court of jurisdiction at
Ambala.
While issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by
this Court on 21.03.2022: -
"The applicant is seeking transfer of a petition bearing
1 of 4
No.HMA-41-2022 titled as 'Sachin Kumar Vs. Sonia' filed by
the respondent under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955 which is pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge,
Family Court, Jalandhar (Annexure P-1), to a Court of
competent jurisdiction at Ambala, which is approximately 170
kms. Away.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that following
two petitions already stand filed by the applicant and are
pending at Ambala:-
i) Petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
ii) Petition under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,
2005."
Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh
Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor
Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court
observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are
required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of
the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to
another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their
convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants
under undue hardships."
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to prayer
2 of 4
of the petitioner.
It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a
matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider
family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition
of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and
most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without
assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and
fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges
and travelling expenses.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact
that the petitioner-wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and
transportation expenses and in view of the judgments in Sumita Singh's
case (supra) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's case (supra) passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to allow the present
petition, subject to the following conditions:-
1. The petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
pending before the Family Court, Jalandhar will be transferred
to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ambala.
2. The District Judge, Ambala will assign the said petition to the
competent Court of jurisdiction.
3. The Family Court, Jalandhar is directed to transfer all the
record pertaining to the aforesaid case(s) to District Judge,
Ambala.
3 of 4
4. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court,
Ambala within a period of 01 month from today.
Present petition is disposed of accordingly.
[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ] JUDGE 26.07.2022 vishnu
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!