Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhawna Sharma And Ors vs Tejinder Sharma
2022 Latest Caselaw 6767 P&H

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6767 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2022

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Bhawna Sharma And Ors vs Tejinder Sharma on 13 July, 2022
TA-465-2022                                                        -1-



       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                                TA-465-2022 (O&M)
                                                Date of decision: 13.07.2022

Bhawna Sharma and others
                                                                  ....Petitioners



                                          Vs.



Tejinder Sharma
                                                                 ....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present:     Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate
             for the petitioners.

                    *******

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)

Prayer in this petition is for transfer of Civil Suit filed by the

respondent-husband, pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division,

Rajpura, District Patiala to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ambala.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account

of a matrimonial discord, the petitioner filed a petition under Section 125

Cr.P.C. and FIR under Sections 406 & 498-A IPC at Ambala. It is further

submitted that on account of a petition filed by the respondent-husband, the

petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case, as there is a

distance of about 30 kms between Rajpura and Ambala.

1 of 4

Learned counsel has further contended that the petitioner is

having a minor daughter, who is living in her care and custody and she is

facing difficulty to defend the case, as she has to travel from Ambala to

Rajpura.

Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh

Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor

Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court

observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are

required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of

the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to

another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their

convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants

under undue hardships."

It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a

matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider

family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition

of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and

most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without

assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and

fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges

and travelling expenses.

After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact

that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying

2 of 4

further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner-wife will

have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in view

of the judgments in Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor

Pardeshi's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court

deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following

conditions:-

1. The Civil Suit filed by the respondent-husband, pending before

the Civil Judge, Jr. Divn., Rajpura, District Patiala will be

transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ambala.

2. The District Judge, Ambala, will assign the said suit to the

competent Court of jurisdiction.

However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this

petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-

(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount,

if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under

Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act

or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay

Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court

proceedings at Rajpura, on each and every date of hearing.

(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-

towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the

case at Rajpura, in case the respondent opt to contest this

3 of 4

petition.

Present petition is disposed of accordingly.

[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ] JUDGE 13.07.2022 vishnu

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter