Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6534 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2022
TA No.604 of 2022 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
TA No.604 of 2022 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.07.2022
Deeshpal @ Deeshpal Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
Varinder Singh
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed
under Sections 13(1)(1a)(1b), 1 (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act,
pending in the Family Court, Camp at Ellenabad, District Sirsa to the
competent Court of jurisdiction at Bathinda.
Counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of a
matrimonial discord, in which a child was born, who is living with the
respondent, the petitioner has filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
as well as a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act, which are
pending at Bathinda and now the respondent has filed a petition under
Sections 13(1)(1a)(1b), 1 (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, before the
Family Court, Camp at Ellenabad, District Sirsa.
Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the
respondent/husband has now filed a petition under Sections 13(1)(1a)
(1b), 1 (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, before the Family Court, Camp
at Ellenabad, District Sirsa, as a counter-blast.
Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account
1 of 3
TA No.604 of 2022 (O&M)
of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing
great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of
about 105 Kms from Bathinda to Camp at Ellenabad, District Sirsa.
Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments
"Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay", 2002 SC 396 and "Rajani Kishor
Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi", 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein
the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the
transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage
and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and
transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should
ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and
the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue
hardships."
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the
fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of
staying further proceedings before the trial Court and in view of the
judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor
Pardeshi's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this
Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the
following conditions:-
1. The petition filed under Sections 13(1)(1a)(1b), 1 (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Camp at Ellenabad, District Sirsa will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Bathinda.
2. The District Judge, Bathinda, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.
However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this
2 of 3
TA No.604 of 2022 (O&M)
petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-
(a) The respondent will clear all the maintenance amount, if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner.
(b) The respondent will undertake to pay Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court proceedings at Camp at Ellenabad, District Sirsa on each and every date of hearing.
(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/- towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the case at Camp at Ellenabad, District Sirsa in case the respondent opt to contest this petition.
Disposed of.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
11.07.2022 yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!