Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6512 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
124
CR-3482-2021
Date of decision: 11.07.2022
SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS ..Petitioners
Versus
JANTA PUSTAKALYA BAWAL TRUST ..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)
The petitioners are the tenants. The Authorities below have
revised the rent from Rs.82/- per month to Rs.92/- per month.
This Bench has heard the learned counsel representing the
petitioners.
He submits that previously the property in question was owned
by Janta Pustakalya Bawal Trust, a registered Society which has never been
dissolved. He submits that the petition filed under Section 4 of the Haryana
Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, is not maintainable.
It is evident from the reading of the judgment passed by the
Appellate Authority that the Society was dissolved by passing a resolution
and Janta Pustakalya Bawal Trust stepped into the shoes of the Society.
The learned counsel representing the petitioner relies upon the
judgment passed in PDM Religious and Educational Association and
others Vs. State of Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others,
2022(1) SCT 59. In that case, the validity of territorial jurisdiction of a
private university set up under the Haryana Private University Act, 2006,
was the primary question.
Hence, the judgment is not applicable to the present case.
1 of 2
In view thereof, no ground to interfere is made out.
Dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
July 11th, 2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
Ay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!