Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17583 P&H
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2022
CRM-M-60188-2022 -1-
124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-60188-2022
Date of Decision:22.12.2022
JAGTAR [email protected] ......... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB ..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Through instant petition under Section 482 of Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner is seeking quashing of order
dated 20.07.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed by Judge Special Court, Tarn
Taran whereby bail bonds furnished by the petitioner have been
cancelled and non-bailable warrants of arrest are issued against the
petitioner in FIR No.31 dated 01.03.2020 under Sections 21 and 29 of
NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Sadar Patti, District Tarn Taran.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that
petitioner was arrested and thereafter released on regular bail vide order
dated 30.04.2020 passed by Judge Special Court, Tarn Taran. The
petitioner failed to appear before Trial Court after 21.01.2022 and on
20.07.2022 learned Trial Court cancelled bail bonds of the petitioner and
issued non-bailable warrants of arrest. The lapse was unintentional and
petitioner is ready to pay costs of Rs.25,000/-. The petitioner undertakes
to appear on each and every date.
Notice of motion.
1 of 3
On the asking of Court, Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Punjab
accepts notice on behalf of the State. He does not dispute the above
stated factual position. He has no objection, if petition is disposed of
subject to costs.
Intent of arrest and reason of denial of bail is to secure the
appearance of the accused at the time of trial. A person who seeks to be
liberated must take judgment and serve sentence in the event of his
conviction. The nature of the crime charged, severity of punishment
prescribed, prime facie available evidences, history & background of the
accused may indicate that any amount of bond and surety is not going to
secure presence of accused, at the time of conviction.
Keeping in mind:
i) The object of cancellation of bond or declaration of anyone
as proclaimed offender/person is to secure his presence. The
petitioner has come forward to face trial and undertakes to
appear before trial court on each and every date, thus ,his
presence would meet ends of justice;
ii) The Petitioner for wasting valuable time and energy of
courts as well prosecution is willing to pay costs of
Rs.25,000/-;
iii) The Petitioner is ready to furnish bond/surety to the
satisfaction of the trial court;
iv) The petitioner was initially granted regular bail by learned
Trial Court, Tarn Taran;
v) Trial is pending since 2020 and petitioner is ready to face
trial, thus, no prejudice is going to cause to prosecution or
2 of 3
complainant;
vi) The petitioner is resident of Ferozpur and trial is pending at
Tarn Taran, thus jurisdictional court and police authorities
have direct access over the activities of the petitioner;
this court is of the considered opinion that present petition
needs to be allowed, and accordingly, petition is allowed. The petitioner
is directed to appear before learned Trial Court on or before 10.01.2023
and on his doing so, the Trial Court shall admit him to bail on furnishing
fresh bail bonds alongwith costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid to the PGI
Poor Patient Welfare Funds, Chandigarh.
Disposed of in above terms.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
22.12.2022
Ali
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!