Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Babu Sah vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4241 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4241 Patna
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2025

Patna High Court

Ram Babu Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 30 October, 2025

Author: Harish Kumar
Bench: Harish Kumar
           THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15455 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Ram Babu Sah, Son of Late Beni Sah, resident of village-Turkauliya, P.O-
     Jhouaram, Police Station-Dhaka, District-East Champaran at Motihari,
     presently posted as Incharge Headmaster upgraded Middle School Shyam
     Bakhari, P.S-Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

                                                                  ... ... Petitioner
                                       Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department,
     Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
2.   The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar,
     New Secretariat, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, Motihari, District-East Champaran at Motihari.
4.   The District Education Officer, Motihari, District- East Champaran at
     Motihari.
5.   The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Motihari, District- East
     Champaran at Motihari.
6.   The Block Education Officer, Dhaka, Block and P.S- Dhaka, District-East
     Champaran at Motihari.
7.   The Secretary Block Teacher Employment Unit, Dhaka, Block and P.S-
     Dhaka, Dist-East Champaran at Motihari.
8.   Sanjeev Ranjan Kumar, s/o Late Mathura Prasad, Resident of village-Shyam
     Bakhari, P.O- Jhauaram, P.S- Dhaka, District- East Champaran, presently
     posted as Assistant Teacher upgraded Middle School (Shyam Bakhari, P.S-
     Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

                                               ... ... Respondents
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, GA.8
                                   Mr. Neeraj Raj, AC to GA.8
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 30-10-2025

Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order

contained in Memo No. 4113, dated 21.08.2025 issued by the

District Programme Officer (Establishment) East Champaran Patna High Court CWJC No.15455 of 2025 dt.30-10-2025

whereby private Respondent No.8 has been appointed as In-

Charge Headmaster upgraded Middle School, Shyam Bakhari,

Dhaka by replacing the petitioner on the basis of representation

of the Respondent No.8.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted

that despite the fact that both the petitioner and the private

Respondent have been duly appointed as Exclusive Teacher and

the petitioner being senior to him, he has been wrongly and

illegally deprived from continuing as In-Charge Headmaster of

the school, in question, by adopting pick and choose basis. It is

further submitted that private Respondent No.8 is also subjected

to departmental as well as criminal cases besides various other

allegations being made by the local people and the villagers by

filing various representations; nonetheless, he was appointed as

In-Charge Headmaster of the school, by replacing the petitioner.

4. Learned Advocate for the State submits that the

issue with regard to the inter se seniority between the petitioner

and the private Respondent is required to be looked into by the

concerned authority.

5. In view of the submissions advanced and taking

note of the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court instead

of keeping the matter pending, thinks it proper to dispose of the Patna High Court CWJC No.15455 of 2025 dt.30-10-2025

same extending liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate

representation along with the necessary documents in support of

his claim before the Respondent No.2, preferably within a

period of four weeks.

6. In case, such a representation is filed by the

petitioner within the stipulated period, the same shall be

considered and disposed of within a further period of eight

weeks.

7. The Writ petition stands disposed of.

(Harish Kumar, J) manish/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          04.11.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter