Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Vivek Transport Agency Through ... vs The Managing Director, Bihar State Food ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4108 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4108 Patna
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2025

Patna High Court

M/S Vivek Transport Agency Through ... vs The Managing Director, Bihar State Food ... on 13 October, 2025

Author: P. B. Bajanthri
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           REQUEST CASE No.125 of 2024
     ======================================================
     M/s Vivek Transport Agency through Kumar Vivek, Male, aged about- 39
     Yrs. Son of Anil Kumar, resident of Near Murgi Farm, Bich Bazar Saraiya,
     P.S.- Nalanda, District- Nalanda.

                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus

1.   The Managing Director, Bihar State Food Civil Supply Corporation through
     the Managing Director Khadya Bhawan, R. Block, Daroga Prasad Rai Path,
     Road No.- 2, Patna- 800001.
2.   The District Manager, State Food Corporation, Vaishali.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :

     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

     ======================================================
             CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 13-10-2025

The present application is filed under Section 11 (6) of

the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to

as 'the Act, 1996') seeking appointment of Arbitrator to adjudicate

the disputes that have arisen among the parties under the

agreement dated 11.08.2016.

2. Brief facts of the case is that the petitioner and

respondents entered into an agreement / contract on 11.08.2016.

The agreement contains an Arbitration Clause namely Clause 21 of

the Notice Inviting Tender which reads as under :

"21. All disputes arising under or in pursuance of this agreement between the parties, Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.125 of 2024 dt.13-10-2025

except matters decision of which herein expressly is otherwise provided, shall be referred to sole arbitration of the C.M.D/ Managing Director of the Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Patna or a person nominated by the C.M.D./ Managing Director decision of such arbitrator shall be final and binding on both the parties. The provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and rules framed thereunder and statutory modifications thereof shall apply to the proceedings of arbitration and all such disputes shall be subject to the jurisdiction of courts at Patna. "

3. Dispute arises among the parties in respect of

partnership. The petitioner invoked arbitration while issuing notice

to the respondents on 08.08.2024 calling upon the respondents to

concur in appointment of Arbitrator. Despite service of notice, the

respondents have failed to act in terms of the arbitration Clause.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arbitration

agreement exists and is valid, but the respondents have failed to

co-operate in appointment of Arbitrator.

4. Considering the fact that whether valid arbitration

agreement among the parties and whether disputes have arisen

thereon warranting reference to arbitration, it is admitted that there

is agreement and so also valid Clause 21 and it relates to

arbitration and it is binding among the respective parties. Disputes Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.125 of 2024 dt.13-10-2025

have admittedly arisen among the parties. The respondents have

failed to act as required for constitution of arbitral tribunal. In view

of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Duro Felguera, S.A. vs. Gangavaram Port Limited reported in

(2017) 9 SCC 729 and Mayavati Trading Private Limited vs.

Praduyat Deb Burman reported in (2019) 8 SCC 714, the Court,

at this stage, is only required to examine the existence of the

arbitration agreement and nothing beyond.

5. Perusal of the agreement, it is evident that Clause 21

is crystal clear that there is Arbitration Clause existing.

Accordingly, this court is satisfied with the requirement of Section

11 of the Act, 1996 and petitioner has made out a case, therefore,

this Court appoints Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha, Former Judge

of Patna High Court, Resident of South of Pillar No. 2 of Railway

Over Bridge, Bailey Road, Adjacent to South of Bihar Neeuro

Diagnostic Centre, Rukanpura, P.S. - Rupaspur, Patna - 801503 as

the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute among the parties. The

Learned Arbitrator shall make disclosure under Section 12 of the

Act, 1996 before entering upon the reference. Fees of the

Arbitrator shall be governed by the Fourth Schedule of the Act,

1996 (unless otherwise agreed by the parties / arbitrator). The

present case is accordingly allowed in the above terms.

Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.125 of 2024 dt.13-10-2025

6. No order as to costs.

7. Registry is hereby directed to communicate the order

to the learned Arbitrator.

(P. B. Bajanthri, CJ) GAURAV S./-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date                15.10.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter