Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Lochan Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4100 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4100 Patna
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2025

Patna High Court

Ram Lochan Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 13 October, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14958 of 2019
     ======================================================
     Ram Lochan Yadav S/o Late Guddar Yadav Vill.- Tilauth, P.s.- Ghoghardiha,
     Distt.- Madhubani

                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Madhubani
2.   The District Magistrate Madhubani
3.   The District Supply Officer Madhubani
4.   The Sub-Divisional Officer Phulpras, Distt.- Madhubani
5.   The Block Supply Officer Ghoghardiha, Distt.- Madhubani
6.   Sri Jailendra Kumar Yadav S/o Upendra Yadav vill.- Inarwa, P.o.- Jageshwar
     Asthan, P.s.- Phulpras, Distt.- Madhubani

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. S.Raza Ahmad (AAG-5)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

                            ORAL JUDGMENT

     Date : 13-10-2025

                 1. The writ petition is filed for the following

     reliefs:-

                                "That this is an application for
                  issuance of a writ in the nature of
                  certiorari to quash the decision dated
                  25.02.2019

of the Selection Committee for selection of the PDS Dealer for PDS

relating to Inarwa Gram Panchayat of the Ghoghardiha Block, Madhubani, district, whereby the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected and recommendation Patna High Court CWJC No.14958 of 2019 dt.13-10-2025

for selection of the respondent No. 6 has been made for PDS Dealer licence and further for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus and /or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for the licence of PDS Dealer of Inarwa Gram Panchayat under Ghoghardiha Block, District, Madhubani."

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the

Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and

Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public

Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides

for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii) 32(v) and

32(vi) read as follows:

"32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days."

Patna High Court CWJC No.14958 of 2019 dt.13-10-2025

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has

an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar

Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order,

2016.

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection Patna High Court CWJC No.14958 of 2019 dt.13-10-2025

Committee he cannot review his orders in an appeal.

Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file a

complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the

same has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within one month from the

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the Patna High Court CWJC No.14958 of 2019 dt.13-10-2025

complaint/application shall be condoned by the

authority concerned, and the authority shall dispose

of the same within three months from the date of

filing of the same.

7. With the above said observation, the Writ

petition is disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Manish/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          16.10.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter