Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shamim Alam @ Shaikh Shamim Ahmad vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 2911 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2911 Patna
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2025

Patna High Court

Shamim Alam @ Shaikh Shamim Ahmad vs The State Of Bihar on 26 June, 2025

Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha
Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13192 of 2025
 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-831 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas
======================================================
Shamim Alam @ Shaikh Shamim Ahmad Son of Laik Ahmed Resident
of Mohalla -Kajipur Shahjalalpir, PS- Sasaram Town, Distt.- Rohtas

                                                               ... ... Petitioner
                                    Versus
The State of Bihar
                                                         ... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Md Ataul Haque, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                    ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 26-06-2025

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This application has been preferred under section

482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, the

"Cr.P.C.") as to quash the order dated 01.02.2025 passed

by learned District Judge-cum-ASJ-IV, Sasaram, Rohtas in

connection with Sessions Trial No. 661/2022 arising out of

Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 831/2019, whereby learned

trial court has been pleased to dismissed the discharge

petition of the petitioner without any cogent reason.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner that though the petitioner is named with First Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13192 of 2025 dt.26-06-2025

Information Report and was found seen by the informant of

this case at the place of occurrence, having country made

pistol in his hand, but specific allegation as to cause fatal

fire arm injury is available against co-accused persons

namely, Pappu Kahar and Aftab Alam.

4. It is submitted that during course of

investigation, specifically in paragraph nos. 386, 287, 295,

323, 324, 325, 328 & 329 of the case diary, independent

witnesses categorically stated that some unknown persons

had killed Rajkumar Choudhary, disputing the entire version

of the informant, and, therefore, there is no ground

available as to frame charge against the petitioner for the

offences punishable under section 302 of the IPC.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, while making a

contrary submission, submitted that petitioner/accused is

named in the FIR and found seen at the place of occurrence

having arms in hand. His implication is with the aid of

section 149 of the IPC, and therefore, it cannot be said that

this is a 'groundless' case as to frame charge against the

petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13192 of 2025 dt.26-06-2025

6. It is submitted that even a grave suspicion is

sufficient to frame a charge, whereas in the present case,

admittedly the informant, who is the eye witness of the

occurrence, stated categorically that petitioner/accused was

involved in the occurrence and found seen with country

made pistol in his hand along with other co-accused

persons.

7. It is further submitted that the defence version

as raised by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

qua alibi cannot be looked into at this stage, being rule of

evidence same can be looked into during the trial.

8. At this stage, it is submitted by learned counsel

for the petitioner that charge against petitioner already

framed during pendency of present petition.

9. Taking note of aforesaid factual submission,

rejection of prayer under section 227 of the Cr.P.C. as

pressed by the petitioner before the learned trial court,

which is the impugned order also in the present proceeding,

does not require any interference, as there is sufficient

ground to frame charge against the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13192 of 2025 dt.26-06-2025

10. Admittedly, charges already framed against the

petitioner and trial of this case begins. Hence, present

petition appears devoid of any merit.

11. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

12. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the

learned trial court immediately.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Rajeev/-

AFR/NAFR                      NAFR
CAV DATE                       NA
Uploading Date             27.06.2025
Transmission Date          27.06.2025
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter