Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pannalal Roy (Retd. Hawaldar) vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 1809 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1809 Patna
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2025

Patna High Court

Pannalal Roy (Retd. Hawaldar) vs The State Of Bihar on 17 February, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8629 of 2024
     ======================================================
1.    Mostt. Maya Devi Wife of Late Bindeshwari Mehra (Retd. Hawaldar)
      Resident of Village- Yogiraj Nurullapur @Jogirar P.O.- Naya Tola, P.S.-
      Puraini, Dist.- Madhepura.
2.   Sri Hari Narayan Yadav (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of Saini Yadav Resident Of
     village and P.O.- Beharai, P.S.- Singheshwar, Dist.- Madhepura.
3.   Laxmi Paswan (Retd. Sub Inspector) Son of Bachhi Paswan Resident of
     Village- Madarganj, Ward No.-14 P.O and P.S.-Simraha, Dist.- Araria.

                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt.
     of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Director General of Police, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
3.   The Director General, Bihar Military Police, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road
     Patna, Bihar-cum- Chairman of the Committee.
4.   The Inspector General of Police, Budget/Appeal/Welfare, Patel Bhawan,
     Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
5.   The Inspector General of Police (Head Quarter), Patel Bhawan, Bailey
     Road, Patna, Bihar.
6.   The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, Central
     Range, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
7.   The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna.
8.   The Commandant, Bihar Military Police-12, Saharsa, IRB-2, Battalion
     Headquarter at Bhimnagar, Birpur, District- Supaul.
9.   The Commandant, Bihar Military Police- 4, Dumraon, Buxar.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
                               with

                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8673 of 2024
     ======================================================
1.    Pannalal Roy (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of Bulaki Roy Resident of village-
      Nardiganj, P.O.- Madhomil, P.S.- Malsalami, District - Patna. Permanent
      resident of Village-Rustampur, P.S. Raghopur, District-Vaishali.
2.   Sanjivan Prasad (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of Ramprit Prasad Resident of
     village- Beladih near hospital, P.O. and P.S.- Belaganj District- Gaya.
3.   Veer Singh Mahto (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of Yogeshwar Mahto, Resident of
     village Domandih P.O.-Tutkinawadih, P.S.- Silli, District Ranchi
     (Jharkhand).
4.   Daniel Masih (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of William Masih Resident of village
 Patna High Court CWJC No.8629 of 2024 dt.17-02-2025
                                           2/5




        Bastipur Triveni lane, P.O. Manikpur, P.S.- Indrapuri, District Rohtas.
  5.    Ful chand Ram (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of Shanker Ram, Resident of village
        Mukundpur, P.O.- Manoharpur, P.S. Rajpur, District Buxar.
  6.    Dharmraj Singh (Retd. Hawaldar) Son of Jamadar Singh, Resident of village
        purana cable town, Quarter No.- M/ 4- 112Main road PO and PS - Gol muri,
        District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand).
  7.    Uday Shankar Singh (Retd. A.S.I.) Son of Shyam Bihari Singh, Resident of
        village Saraiya, P.O. Saraiya, P.S. Sonepur, District- Saran.

                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                             Versus

  1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt.
        of Bihar, Patna.
  2.    The Director General of Police, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
  3.    The Director General, Bihar Military Police, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road
        Patna, Bihar-cum- Chairman of the Committee.
  4.    The Inspector General of Police, Budget/Appeal/Welfare, Patel Bhawan,
        Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
  5.    The Inspector General of Police (Head Quarter), Patel Bhawan, Bailey
        Road, Patna, Bihar.
  6.    The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, Central
        Range, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
  7.    The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna.
  8.    The Commandant, Bihar Special Armed Police (B. S. A. P) -2, Dehri, Dist-
        Sasaram.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
       Appearance :
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8629 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s      :       Mr. Kumar Praveen
       For the Respondent/s      :       Mr. Anuradha Singh
                                         SC 21
       (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8673 of 2024)
       For the Petitioner/s      :       Mr. Kumar Praveen
       For the Respondent/s      :       Mr. Anuradha Singh
                                         SC 21
       ======================================================
       CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
       ORAL JUDGMENT
         Date : 17-02-2025

                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

         learned counsel for the respondents-State.
 Patna High Court CWJC No.8629 of 2024 dt.17-02-2025
                                           3/5




                        2. Since the common issue is involved in both the

         petitions, both the writ petitions are being disposed of by a

         common order.

                        3. Husband of the petitioner no. 1 in C.W.J.C. No.

         8629 of 2024 namely Bindeshwari Mehra and the petitioner nos.

         2 and 3 of the said writ petition as well as all the petitioners in

         C.W.J.C. No. 8673 of 2024 were appointed to the post of

         Constable in B.M.P. After completion of their services, they

         stood retired from their services.

                        4. During their services period, they were benefited

         A.C.P. applicable to them. Now, the respondents passed the

         order of recovery of excess payment which has been given to

         the petitioners on account of wrongly granted A.C.P. to them.

                         5. Learned counsel appearing in both the petitions

         jointly submits that in terms of law laid down by the Hon'ble

         Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and Others Vs.

         Rafiq Masih (White Washer) and Others reported in 2015 (4)

         SCC 334 recovery from the employees belonging to Class-III

         and Class-IV is not permissible, in case where the excess

         payment has been made for a period in excess of five years

         before the order of recovery is issued. According to the

         counsels, the case of the petitioners herein squarely covered
 Patna High Court CWJC No.8629 of 2024 dt.17-02-2025
                                           4/5




         with the above judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

                        6. Reliance has also been placed by the counsel to

         the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court on

         26.04.2024

in L.P.A. No. 458 of 2021 in the case of Srikant

Dubey and others Vrs. The State of Bihar and Others and also

reliance has been placed by the counsel to the judgment passed

by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 02.09.2024 in the

case of Saheb Sharan Das Vrs. The State of Bihar in C.W.J.C.

No. 8062 of 2021.

7. Learned State counsel though opposed the

argument raised by the counsel for the petitioners but he fairly

admitted the fact that the case of the petitioners is also squarely

covered with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of State of Punjab and Others Vs. Rafiq

Masih (White Washer) and Others reported in 2015 (4) SCC

334.

8. On the submissions made by both the counsels

and on perusal of the documents annexed with the petition, it is

quite clear that all the petitioners herein are retired Hawaldars

and after their retirement, the order of recovery of excess

payment on account of wrongly given A.C.P. has been passed.

Therefore, the case of the petitioners herein is squarely covered Patna High Court CWJC No.8629 of 2024 dt.17-02-2025

with the above referred judgment passed by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court as well as the Division Bench and the learned

Single Judge of this Court. Accordingly, in the light of the

above, both the petitions are allowed. The order of recovery of

excess payment passed by the respondents in both the cases with

regard to the petitioners are concerned are set aside. The

respondents are hereby further directed to refund the recovered

amount, if any, to the respective petitioners within a period of 3

months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this

order.

9. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are allowed.

(Arvind Singh Chandel , J) shailendra/-

AFR/NAFR                NA
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          19.02.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter