Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1705 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4064 of 2024
======================================================
Adyaraj Krishna JV having its registered office at 202, Vishnu Places, East
Boring Canal Road, Patna- 800001 through its authorised signatory Jitendra
Kumar Roy, aged about 48 Years, male, S/o Ram Sagar Prasad, Resident of H.
No.- 57, Montesari School Lane, Gandhi Nagar, Boring Road, Patna, Bihar-
800001.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway,
Hajipur, Bihar.
2. General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Bihar.
3. Divisional Railway Manager, Samastipur Division, East Central Railway,
Samastipur, Bihar.
4. Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Officer (F.A & CAO), East Central
Railway, Hajipur, Bihar.
5. Chief Project Manager, Gati Shakti, Samastipur Division, East Central
Railway.
6. Alok Kumar Jha, Chief Project Manager, Gati Shakti, Samastipur Division,
East Central Railway.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Basant Kumar Choudhary, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG
Mr. Alok Kumar, CGC
Ms. Prakritita Sharma, J.C. to ASG
Mr. Devansh Shankar Singh, JC to ASG
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 06-03-2024
Petitioner was aggrieved with the disqualification
made in a tender submitted as against the Notice Inviting Tender
(NIT) for upgradation of the Railway Station at Sitamarhi. The
ground raised was that the disqualification was made by one Patna High Court CWJC No.4064 of 2024 dt.06-03-2024
line. However, at present a clarification has been sought for
from the petitioner. The petitioner had filed a representation
based on which the petitioner has been called for a
consideration.
2. In such circumstance, we permit the petitioner to
withdraw the writ petition to agitate the cause before the
authority, and if any prejudicial order is passed, to agitate the
cause afresh.
3. The writ petition stands closed with the above
liberty.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
(Harish Kumar, J) P.K.P./-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 07.03.2024 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!