Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sirichan Vishwakarma @ Sirichan Mistri ... vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 691 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 691 Patna
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2024

Patna High Court

Sirichan Vishwakarma @ Sirichan Mistri ... vs The State Of Bihar on 29 January, 2024

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        CRIMINAL REVISION No.420 of 2019
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Aurangabad
     ======================================================
     SIRICHAN VISHWAKARMA @ SIRICHAN MISTRI @ SRICHAND
     VISHWAKARMA Son of Late Sukhdev Mistri @ Sukhdev Vishwakarma
     Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                            Versus
1.   The State of Bihar
2.   Anju Devi Wife of Srichan Vishwakarma @ Sirichan Mistri @ Srichand
     Vishwakarma Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. - Jamhor, District-
     Aurangabad and at present residing at Village - Kharanti, P.O.- Dosma, P.S.-
     Rafigang, District- Aurangabad

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s    :         Mr. Yugal Kishore, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s    :         Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI

                                   ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 29-01-2024

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner as well as

learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner/husband has challenged an order of

maintenance being Maintenance Case No. 100 of 2014, passed by

the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad on 31 st

March, 2018, directing the petitioner to pay maintenance

allowance @ Rs. 10,000/-per month to the opposite party no. 2 and

the minor daughter of the parties.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.420 of 2019 dt.29-01-2024

3. On perusal of the materials on record and the

impugned order, it is ascertained that the marriage between the

parties is not disputed. It is also found that opposite party no. 2 is

living separately with her minor daughter. Therefore, the petitioner

is under obligation to pay maintenance allowance to the opposite

party no.2 and their daughter.

4. Only issue in the instant revision is the quantum of

maintenance. In her petition, the opposite party no. 2 stated that

the petitioner has a shop under the name and style of Srichan

Vishwakarma, where he sells iron items and asbestos sheets. He

earns considerable money through his business. Moreover, he has

income from agricultural land.

5. On the other hand, the petitioner has denied the

allegation made out by the opposite party no. 2 in her application

under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of his income. He has

pleaded that he is a day labourer under a mason and he earns his

personal source of sustenance working as a day labourer.

6. In Anju Garj Vrs. Deepak Kumar Garg, reported in

AIR online 2022 SC 306, the Hon'ble Supreme Court relied on the

earlier decisions of the Apex Court in paragraph-9 as hereunder:-

"9. At the outset, it may be noted that Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. was conceived to ameliorate the agony, Patna High Court CR. REV. No.420 of 2019 dt.29-01-2024

anguish and financial suffering of a women who is required to leave the matrimonial home, so that some suitable arrangements could be made to enable her to sustain herself and the children as observed by this Court in Bhuwan Mohan Singh Vrs. Meena and Ors.."

7. The Hon'ble Apex Court further held that even the

opposite party/husband does not have sufficient means, he being

an able body person, capable of work is under obligation to

maintain his wife and minor daughter.

8. In a recent decision passed by a Coordinate Bench of

the Allahabad High Court in Kamal Vrs. State of U.P. (Criminal

Revision No. 461 of 2023), decided on 25.01.2024, it is held by a

learned Single Judge that the income of the husband shall be

assessed on the basis of Minimum Wages Act. If the principle is

applied, then this Court safely presume that the petitioner earns

Rs.12,000/- per month. 1/3 of the said sum come to Rs. 4,000/-.

The opposite party no. 2 is entitled to get Rs. 4,000/- per month

from the petitioner for herself and her minor daughter.

9. Therefore, the impugned order with regard to the

quantum of maintenance is modified. The petitioner is directed to

pay a sum of Rs. 4,000/- per month for the maintenance of the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.420 of 2019 dt.29-01-2024

opposite party no. 2 and her minor daughter from the date of filing

of the application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. within 10 th of

each succeeding months. The arrear maintenance shall be paid as

per the direction fixed by the trial court in execution proceeding.

10. With the above order, the instant revision is disposed

of.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J) pravinkumar/-

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter