Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 546 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12868 of 2012
======================================================
1. Mani Bhushan Sharma S/O Shailendra Prasad Singh R/O village + P.O.-
Adauri, P.S.-Pipradhi, District- Sheohar
2. Raju Kumar Singh S/O Nandlal Singh R/O Chiraiya, P.O.- Barahi Jagdish,
P.S.- Purnahiya, District- Sheohar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat,
Bihar.
2. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna
3. The Chairman, Central Selection Board Of Constables, Pant Bhawan, 4th
Floor, Bailey Road, Patna
4. The Secretary Central Selection Board Of Constables, Back Harding Road,
Patna-1
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Madhubala Verma
Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh, Advocates
For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, GP-21
For the C.S.B.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey
Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra
mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Advocates
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-01-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the Central Selection Board of Constable. Patna High Court CWJC No.12868 of 2012 dt.22-01-2024
2. The present writ petition has been filed for declaring
the result of the written test given by the petitioner for the post of
Constable from Home Guard Quota.
3. Earlier the petitioner Mani Bhushan Sharma has
moved before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 1000 of 2011 which was
disposed of vide order dated 05.07.2011 in which the petitioner
has submitted that his case is covered by the decision rendered in
L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and for this submissions made by learned
counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of but the
petitioner approached again this Hon'ble Court for the same relief
and petitioner is seeking in his writ petition for publishing the
result of the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 (Central
Selection Board of Constables) has filed a counter affidavit stating
therein that LPA No. 831 of 2009 is pertaining to the
Advertisement No. 01 of 2004 and 02 of 2004 and the present
Advertisement No. 02 of 2009 in which the present petitioners
have appeared in the written test and candidature of both the writ
petitioners were rejected due to filing their wrong roll number in
their answer sheets during the examination and due to this reason,
the result of the petitioners were not published and the candidature Patna High Court CWJC No.12868 of 2012 dt.22-01-2024
of both the petitioners were rejected due to invalid roll number
mentioned in the answer sheets.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, that the Board has
rightly rejected the candidature of the petitioners in terms of the
advertisement and, accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date 23.01.2024 Transmission Date N.A.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!