Friday, 22, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajay Bihari Prasad Singh vs The State Of Bihar
2024 Latest Caselaw 5193 Patna

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5193 Patna
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024

Patna High Court

Ajay Bihari Prasad Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 5 August, 2024

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       CRIMINAL REVISION No 574 of 2023
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Vaishali
     ======================================================
     Ajay Bihari Prasad Singh son of Shivjee Prasad Singh Village- Po- Nainha
     Milki Ps- Sadar Hajipur Dist- Vaishali at Hajipur

                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                            Versus
1.   The State of Bihar
2.   Punam Kumari wife of Ajay Bihari Prasad Singh, D/o- Satya Narayan Singh
     R/o- Village- Po- Nainha Milki Ps- Sadar Hajipur Dist- Vaishali at Hajipur

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s    :        Ms Sudha, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s    :        Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL

                                   ORAL JUDGMENT

      Date : 05-08-2024


                 This revision petition has been preferred by the

     petitioner-husband of opposite party No 2-wife being aggrieved

     with the judgment dated 09.05.2023 passed by the learned

     Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Maintenance

     Case No 125 of 2015 whereby the learned Principal Judge, Family

     Court allowed the application filed under Section 125 of the Cr P

     C filed by Opposite Party 2 and directed the petitioner to pay a

     monthly maintenance of Rs 15,000/- from the date of filing the

     application under Section 125 of the Cr P C.

                 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

     that during pendency of the maintenance application before the
 Patna High Court CR. REV. No.574 of 2023 dt.05-08-2024
                                            2/5




       learned Principal Judge, Family Court, vide its order dated

       01.09.2016

, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court directed the

petitioner to pay monthly interim maintenance also at the rate of

Rs 5,000/- to the opposite party No 2-wife. He submits that in her

application under Section 125 of the Cr P C, the opposite party No

2-wife pleaded that the petitioner is getting monthly salary of Rs

12,000/-. However, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court,

while deciding the application on the basis of salary slip (Exhibit

P-1), arrived on the conclusion that the petitioner is getting a

monthly salary of Rs 33,839/- in the year, 2021 and on this ground

only, directed the petitioner to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs

15,000/- from the date of submission of application under Section

125 of the Cr P C. Since the petitioner is already paying the

monthly interim maintenance of Rs 5,000/- from 01.09.2016 and

further considering the fact that in the year 2015, when the

application under Section 125 of the Cr P C was filed by the wife,

the petitioner was getting a monthly salary of Rs 12,000/- only.

The learned Principal Judge, Family Court ought to have directed

the petitioner to pay the monthly maintenance of Rs 15,000/- from

the date of order, i e, 09.05.2023. Lastly, he submits that the

petitioner is ready to pay a monthly maintenance as directed by the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.574 of 2023 dt.05-08-2024

learned Principal Judge, Family Court at the rate of Rs 15,000/-

per month from the date of order, i e, 09.05.2023.

3 Learned counsel for Opposite Party No 2-wife opposes

the prayed made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

However, he admits the fact that in the application filed under

Section 125 of the Cr P C, opposite party No 2-wife herself

pleaded that petitioner-husband is getting a monthly salary of Rs

12,000/- only.

4 I have heard learned counsel appearing for both the

parties and perused the documents as well as the impugned order

available on record.

5 The application under Section 125 of the Cr P C has

been filed in the year, 2015 which is annexed with the petition as

Annexure P-1. In the said application, in paragraph 5, it is pleaded

by opposite party No 2-wife that petitioner is getting a monthly

salary of Rs 12,000/-. Admittedly, by order dated 01.09.2016, the

learned Principal Judge, Family Court directed the petitioner to

pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs 5,000/- to opposite party

No 2-wife. Perusal of the impugned order further shows that on

the basis of salary slip of the year 2001, i e, Exhibit P-1, the

learned Principal Judge, Family Court arrived at the conclusion

that petitioner is getting a monthly salary of Rs 33,839/- and Patna High Court CR. REV. No.574 of 2023 dt.05-08-2024

considering the above monthly salary of the petitioner, the learned

Principal Judge, Family Court fixed the amount of monthly

maintenance at the rate of Rs 15,000/- per month which appears to

be just and proper.

6 The impugned further shows that the learned Principal

Judge, Family Court directed the petitioner to pay the maintenance

amount from the date of submission of application under Section

125 of the Cr P C. This direction issued by the learned Principal

Judge, Family Court is liable to be set aside for the reason that the

learned Principal Judge, Family Court did not consider the fact

that at the time of submission of application under Section 125 of

the Cr P C, as pleaded by opposite party No 2-wife, the petitioner

was getting a monthly salary of Rs 12,000/- only and on the basis

of his salary, which was of the year 2021, the learned Principal

Judge, Family Court directed the petitioner to pay Rs 15,000/- per

month as maintenance amount. Since in the year 2015, the

petitioner was getting monthly salary of Rs 12,000/- only and on

the basis of order passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family

Court dated 01.09.2016, he is already paying interim maintenance

of Rs 5,000/- per month, therefore, the learned Principal Judge,

Family Court ought to have directed the petitioner to pay monthly Patna High Court CR. REV. No.574 of 2023 dt.05-08-2024

maintenance of Rs 15,000/- from the date of order instead from the

date of filing the application.

7 Accordingly, this revision petition is partly allowed.

8 The petitioner is directed to pay a monthly

maintenance of Rs 15,000/- to opposite party No 2-wife from

09.05.2023, i e, the date of order passed by the learned Principal

Judge, Family Court.

9 The petitioner is further directed to pay the entire

interim maintenance amount at the rate of Rs 5,000/- from

01.09.2016 to 09.05.2023, if any, within two months.

10 If any amount is paid by the petitioner, it will be

deducted from the arrears of interim maintenance amount.

(Arvind Singh Chandel, J) M.E.H./-

AFR/NAFR                       NAFR
CAV DATE                        NA
Uploading Date              07.08.2024
Transmission Date           07.08.2024
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter