Patna High Court
M/S Sri Salasar Products And ... vs The Union Of India on 5 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6796 of 2023
======================================================
M/s Sri Salasar Products and Commission Agent Sole proprietor Dilip Kumar
male 50 years, son of Maksudan Ram having its registered office Bhusunda,
Muffasil, PS Manpur, District-Gaya, resident of Village Janta Colony,
Baeragi, Gaya, Bihar-823002, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Department
of Revenue), Government of India, New Delhi.
2. The Under Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue),
Government of India, New Delhi.
3. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
5. The Joint Commissioner State Tax (J.C.S.T.) and Gaya Maadh, Bihar
823002.
6. The Assistant Commissioner State Tax, Magadh Circle, Gaya.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Prasad Singh, Advocate
For the U.O.I : Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG
For the State : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 05-05-2023
The instant writ petition has been filed under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious
reliefs.
The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing
statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before
the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal")
Patna High Court CWJC No.6796 of 2023 dt.05-05-2023
under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act
(hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act").
However, due to non-constitution of the
Tribunal, the petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy
under Sub-Section (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the
B.G.S.T. Act.
Under the circumstances, the petitioner is also
prevented from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of
balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of the
B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of the amounts as contemplated under
Sub-section (8) of Section 112.
The respondent State authorities have
acknowledged the fact of non-constitution of the Tribunal and
come out with a notification bearing Order No. 09/2019-State
Tax, S. O. 399, dated 11.12.2019 for removal of difficulties, in
exercise of powers under Section 172 of the B.G.S.T Act, which
provides that period of limitation for the purpose of preferring
an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 112 shall start only
after the date on which the President, or the State President, as
the case may be, of the Tribunal after its constitution under
Section 109 of the B.G.S.T Act, enters office.
This Court is, therefore, inclined to dispose of
Patna High Court CWJC No.6796 of 2023 dt.05-05-2023
the instant writ petition in the following terms:-
(i) Subject to deposit of a sum equal to 20
percent of the remaining amount of tax in
dispute, if not already deposited, in addition to
the amount deposited earlier under Sub-Section
(6) of Section 107 of the B.G.S.T. Act, the
petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit
of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of
the B.G.S.T. Act. The petitioner cannot be
deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution
of the Tribunal by the respondents themselves.
The recovery of balance amount, and any steps
that may have been taken in this regard will thus
be deemed to be stayed. It is not in dispute that
similar relief has been granted by this Court in
the case of SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The
State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465
of 2022.
(ii) The statutory relief of stay, on deposit of the
statutory amount, however in the opinion of this
Court, cannot be open ended. For balancing the
equities, therefore, the Court is of the opinion
that since order is being passed due to non-
constitution of the Tribunal by the respondent-
Authorities, the petitioner would be required to
present/file his appeal under Section 112 of the
B.G.S.T. Act, once the Tribunal is constituted
and made functional and the President or the
State President may enter office. The appeal
would be required to be filed observing the
statutory requirements after coming into
existence of the Tribunal, for facilitating
consideration of the appeal.
(iii) In case the petitioner chooses not to avail
the remedy of appeal by filing any appeal under
Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act before the
Tribunal within the period which may be
specified upon constitution of the Tribunal, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.6796 of 2023 dt.05-05-2023
respondent- Authorities would be at liberty to
proceed further in the matter, in accordance with
law.
With the above liberty, observation and directions, the writ
petition stands disposed of.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J)
aditya/sunil
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date 08.05.2023.
Transmission Date
