Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3476 Patna
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.562 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-1996 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas
======================================================
Anil Tiwari, Son of Hardeo Tiwari Resident of Ward No.-3, Biseni Kala, Bisunpur, Police Station- Rajpur, Distict- Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 498 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-1996 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Dadan Dusadh @ Dadan Paswan S/o Late Dudh Nath Dusadh R/o village- Baligaon, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Rohtas
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 540 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-1996 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Kapil Singh Yadav Son of Late Mohan Singh Resident of Village- Husenabad, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Rohtas.
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 707 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-1996 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Hari Kahar @ Hari Ram S/o Late Moti Kahar R/o village- Barna, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Rohtas at Sasaram
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 729 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-1996 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== BABAN KAHAR Son of Moti Kahar Resident of Village - Dhobdiha, P.S.- Nasariganj, Dist.- Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
(In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 562 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Vindhya Keshri Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Dhaneshwar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 498 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 540 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh, Advocate Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 707 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 729 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) Date : 03-08-2023
All these appeals have been taken up
together and are being disposed of by this common
judgment.
2. Heard Mr. Vindhya Keshri Kumar, learned
Senior Advocate, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Mr. Ram Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
Chandra Singh and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1 for the
appellants and Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma and Mr. Sujit
Kumar Singh, learned A.P.Ps. for the State.
3. All these appeals are directed against the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated
02.04.2019 passed by the learned Fast Track Court-II,
Civil Court, Sasaram, Rohtas in Sessions Trial No. 331
of 2001, arising out of Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 179 of
1996, whereby all the appellants have been convicted
under Section 364A/34 of the I.P.C. and have been
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.
4. It is a peculiar case where the victim, who
has been examined as P.W. 3, returned only a day after
he is stated to have been abducted.
5. Three persons have deposed against the
appellants. The F.I.R. has been lodged by the father of
the victim, who has not been examined at the trial.
6. Nonetheless, in order to appreciate the Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
story propounded by the prosecution, we have found
that the father of the victim was informed that his son
has been kidnapped while he along with his associates
had gone to the river side for fishing. On such
information, he along with two others, none of whom
have been examined at the trial, went in search of his
son, but on way was informed by somebody else, who
too has not been examined, that, perhaps, the appellants
have taken away the victim. The purpose of abduction
was not known to the informant. Later, on the basis of
the names provided in the F.I.R., investigation
proceeded and all the appellants were charge-sheeted.
7. All of them were put on trial.
8. The Trial Court, after having examined
only three witnesses on behalf of the prosecution,
convicted the appellants as aforesaid.
9. As noted above, P.Ws. 1 and 2, namely,
Ashok Singh and Banke Bihari Tiwary, have not stated
anything against the appellants. They do not claim to Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
have seen the occurrence. They are said to have been
informed by unknown persons in the village that,
perhaps, the appellants had abducted the victim.
10. The victim, as we have noted, came back
only a day after.
11. The victim, who has been examined as
P.W. 3, has a very interesting story to narrate. He has,
during the course of trial, stated that he was abducted,
when he along with his nephew and others had fallen
asleep beneath a bridge near the water body where they
had gone fishing. His nephew was assaulted by one of
the miscreants who was carrying a gun with him. The
nephew of P.W. 3 has not been examined at the trial nor
any explanation has been offered for his non-
examination. The victim claims to have been blind-folded
and taken to some distance where he was kept in a
room. He was also offered food in the night and in the
morning thereafter which he did not eat. Later, when he
removed the blinders from his eyes, he saw two of the Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
miscreants sleeping. He did not identify any one of
them, but could notice that one of them was keeping a
fire-arm by his side. He valiantly took the fire-arm and
opened the door of the room in which he was confined
and somehow reached Barun village. When he met the
villagers of Barun, he disclosed that he had been
kidnapped and with their help, he reached his village
home.
12. The story narrated by P.W. 3 does not
appear to be acceptable at all for the reason that he
does not name any one of the appellants. He has come
up with two or three reasons for his abduction, none of
which could be proved by the prosecution. He was
ostensibly told by one of his kidnappers that because he
has Rs. 12 to 13 Lakhs stashed in his bank, therefore,
he has been kidnapped. This statement was made by
him under Section 164 Cr.P.C. He further states that the
weapon of the miscreants which he had taken along with
him was not taken by the police officer, who actually Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
advised him not to do so for the reason that otherwise
he may be made an accused in a criminal case involving
fire-arms. Apart from this, he has stated before the Trial
Court that there was some Panchayati some times ago in
the village where a P.D.S. dealer had threatened him
that he would be kidnapped within fifteen days and,
ultimately, he was kidnapped.
13. The entire story line is redolent with
doubt and suspicion.
14. Nobody has seen the occurrence. The
P.Ws. 1 and 2 were a little surprised when questioned as
to why the father and the son (P.W. 3) were behind the
appellants who were neither seen by anyone of the
witnesses nor any person who could have really thrown
light on the prosecution version, were examined at the
trial.
15. The story narrated by the father of the
victim as also the victim therefore does not inspire
confidence.
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
16. We also find that prosecution has not
bothered to examine either the informant or the I.O. of
this case.
17. For these reasons, we set aside the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
02.04.2019, passed by Mr. Ravindra Mani Tripathi, the
learned Fast Track Court-II, Civil Court, Sasaram,
Rohtas in Sessions Trial No. 331 of 2001, arising out of
Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 179 of 1996, and acquit the
appellants of the charges levelled against them.
18. All these appeals stand allowed.
19. The appellants, viz., Anil Tiwari [Cr.
Appeal (DB) No. 562 of 2019], Dadan Dusadh @ Dadan
Paswan [Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 498 of 2019] and Kapil
Singh Yadav [Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 540 of 2019] are in
custody. They are directed to be set at liberty forthwith
unless their detention is required in any other case.
20. The appellants, viz., Hari Kahar @ Hari Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.562 of 2019 dt.03-08-2023
Ram [Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 707 of 2019] and Baban
Kahar [Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 729 of 2019] are on bail.
Their liabilities under the bail-bonds are cancelled.
21. Let a copy of this judgment be
dispatched to the Superintendent of the concerned Jail
forthwith for compliance and record.
22. The records of these appeals be returned
to the Trial Court forthwith.
23. Interlocutory application/s, if any, also
stand disposed off accordingly.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
(Vipul M. Pancholi, J)
K.C.Jha/Praveen
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
Uploading Date 08.08.2023
Transmission Date 08.08.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!