Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Md. Moin vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 5329 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5329 Patna
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2022

Patna High Court
Md. Moin vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 20 December, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Letters Patent Appeal No.260 of 2019
                                          In
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18435 of 2014
     ======================================================

Md. Moin son of Late Abdul Gaffur A Resident of Village - Sabutter, P.S. - Kritya Nand Nagar, District- Purnea.

... ... Appellant/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar and Ors Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Department of Rural works, Government Of Bihar, Patna Bihar

3. Under Secretary Department of Rural works, Government of Bihar, Patna Bihar

4. Superintending Engineer Rural Works Department Work Anchal.

Kishanganj-1

5. Executive engineer Rural works Department, Work Division Kishanganj-1 Bihar

6. District Magistrate, Kishanganj District- Kishanganj Bihar

7. Establishment Deputy Collector,Kishanganj Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajni Kant Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Pushkar Narain Shahi (Aag6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 20-12-2022

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. The appellant has assailed the order of the

learned Single Judge dated 07.01.2019 passed in C.W.J.C No.

18435 of 2014. The appellant's father was working as an

employee in the Work Charge Establishment, he died while he

was in service. In the result, appellant was appointed on Patna High Court L.P.A No.260 of 2019 dt.20-12-2022

30.10.1993 to the post of Roller Khalasi in the pay scale of Rs.

775-12-955-14-1025. While he was working as such

respondents were stated to have noticed that appellant is not

entitled to compassionate appointment with reference to service

particulars of his deceased father, that deceased employee was

not regular holder of the post in the department. Such error has

been noticed in the year 2014. Orally services of the appellant

was terminated with effect from 11.09.2014. Feeling aggrieved

by oral termination, appellant filed C.W.J.C No. 18435 of 2014

and it was dismissed on 07.01.2019 hence, the present L.P.A.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that

he has rendered unblemished services from 30.10.1993 till

11.09.2014. The learned Single Judge has not appreciated dates

and events and also appellant was regularly appointed to hold

the post of Roller Khalasi in the Work Charge Establishment in

the pay scale of Rs. 775-12-955-14-1025. In other words, he is a

permanent employee, before terminating his services, he is

entitled to notice and other formalities like holding of an inquiry

under Bihar Government Service CCA Rules, 2005.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent

resisted the aforesaid contentions and submitted that appellant

initially appointed on compassionate ground in the post of Patna High Court L.P.A No.260 of 2019 dt.20-12-2022

Roller Khalasi in the pay scale of Rs. 775-12-955-14-1025 is

contrary to factual aspect to the extent that his late father was

not a permanent employee so as to extend compassionate

appointment to the appellant. The same has been noticed in the

year 2014, therefore, the Superintendent of Engineer proceeded

to ask the appellant to not to attend the work. In other words,

oral termination has been ordered and it is in accordance with

law.

5. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

6. Appellant's father was working on ad-hoc basis

in the Work Charge Establishment and he died. In the result, the

then officials were under the impression that deceased employee

was regular hold of the post in the department. Thus, proceeded

to process the appellant's application for compassionate

appointment and it was issued on 30.10.1993 while appointing

him to the post of Roller Khalasi in the Work Charge

Establishment in the pay scale of Rs. 775-12-955-14-1025. It is

to be noted that 30.10.1993 order of compassionate appointment

to a particular post read with pay scale has not been

withdrawn/canceled/modified till today.

7. On the other hand, oral termination has been

ordered on 11.09.2014. When the appellant has rendered service Patna High Court L.P.A No.260 of 2019 dt.20-12-2022

from 30.10.1993 in the capacity of permanent employee. In such

an event the respondents should have initiated departmental

inquiry under Bihar CCA Rules, 2005. No such action has been

taken even to this day. By virtue of our previous order the

appellant is stated to have been taken back to duty on

13.12.2022.

8. In the light of these facts and circumstances the

appellant is entitled to continue to hold the post pursuant to the

order of appointment dated 30.10.1993. The concerned

respondent is hereby directed to extend all service and monetary

benefits during the period from 11.09.2014 till 13.12.2022 and

further continued to extend all service and monetary benefits

from time to time. The inaction of the respondent in the year

1993 cannot be rectified at this distance of time that too after

decades. The factual material information has not been apprised

by the learned Single Judge, therefore, order of the learned

Single Judge dated 07.01.2019 passed in C.W.J.C No. 18435 of

2014 stands set aside. The appellant is entitled to all monetary

benefits during the intervening period from the date of

termination till reinstatement along with interest @ 8% per

annum.

9. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent Patna High Court L.P.A No.260 of 2019 dt.20-12-2022

pointed out from Para 13 of the supplementary counter affidavit

dated 14.12.2022.

10. Para 13 of the supplementary counter affidavit

reads as under:-

"That however even if the appellant would have not stopped coming to duty in that case to the petitioner would have been removed from service in compliance of resolution no. 10710 dated 17.10.2013 of the Finance Department, Govt, of Bihar and the Office Order no. 19 dated 31.01.2014 issued by the present respondent department."

11. The aforesaid action dated 17.10.2013 vide

resolution no. 10710 and the Office Order No. 19 dated

31.01.2014 are without resorting to Bihar CCA Rules, 2005 as

appellant had the permanent status that he was holder of the post

of Roller Khalasi in the pay scale of Rs. 775-12-955-14-1025.

12. Therefore, the aforesaid decisions are hereby

rejected.




                                                                (P. B. Bajanthri, J)


shoaib/-                                                      (Purnendu Singh, J)
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          23.12.2022.
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter