Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4932 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.213 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2019 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
1. Ugwumsinachi Oniya, Son of Gabriel Oniya, Permanent resident of 20, Chalons Close Enugu NGWO, Enugu State, Nigeria.
2. Solomon Aliagwu, Son of Richard Aliagwu, Permanent resident 15 Ogbeini Street, Agbor, OB I Delta State, Nigeria.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abu Nasar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.B.N. Pandey, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-10-2021 Re: I.A.No.1 of 2020
Limitation petition, bearing I.A. No.1 of 2020, has been
filed for condoning the delay of 33 days in filing the instant
revision application.
2. In view of cause being shown in the interlocutory
application praying for condonation and there being no opposition
from the learned A.P.P., I.A. No.1 of 2020 stands allowed. The
revision application is deemed to have been filed within time.
Re: Criminal Revision No.213 of 2020
This revision application is limited to the question of
legality of the sentence awarded by the court of A.C.J.M.-V,
Sitamarhi under the judgment and order dated 18.10.2019 in G.R. Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
No.1109 of 2019 arising out of Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.103 of
2019. The learned court has convicted the petitioners for the
offence punishable under Section 14 of the Foreigners
(Amendment) Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and
sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three years, setting
off the period undergone by them prior to passing of the sentence
in judicial custody.
2. Since the petitioners have pleaded guilty, they have
not questioned or raised any issue in respect of the conviction.
3. According to the prosecution case, it is stated that
the informant was deputed as Executive Magistrate during the
election. On 14.03.2019 at 6:30 A.M., one Amar Jyoti Bus, bearing
registration No.BR 06PA7167, on way from Sitamarhi to Patna
was stopped at Runnisaidpur Police Station by the Driver of the
bus along with the passengers. The Driver intimated that two
foreign nationals (these petitioners) have boarded the bus for going
to Patna and he found their activities to be doubtful. Petitioners
were thus questioned by the informant along with police officials.
They have admitted to reach Sitamarhi through Siliguri in India
from Kakarbitha (Nepal). They have stated that they were going to
Patna. On search, they were found to be in possession of passport
issued on 13.11.2018 and valid up till 12.11.2023. In respect of Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
Petitioner Nos.1 and 2, a tourist visa for 15 and 30 days
respectively, was stamped on their passports. Petitioner Nos.1 and
2 have arrived in Nepal on 08.03.2019 and 11.03.2019
respectively. Their visa was to expire on 22.03.2019. It is further
the prosecution case that Indian, Nigerian, Canadian and American
currency was recovered from the petitioners. Five mobile sets with
SIM cards, voter card of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, clothes,
other articles of daily use, some CDs, tablet, including old passport
were found in their possession.
4. A seizure list was also prepared in presence of
independent witnesses. Chargesheet was submitted for the offence
under Section 14 of the Foreigners (Amendment) Act, 2004 and
investigation was kept pending for examination of the seized
articles and documents.
5. The Court of C.J.M., Sitamarhi took cognizance of
the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504 of the I.P.C. and Section
14 of the Foreigner (Amendment) Act, 2004 against the instant
petitioners.
6. The two petitioners on the same date filed an
application in the court of C.J.M., Sitamarhi pleading guilty to
contravention of Section 14 of the Act and confessing their crime.
They prayed that they want to go back to their country. The Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
petition was kept on record and was transferred to the court of
A.C.J.M. The record thereafter shuttled between the court of
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and Chief Judicial Magistrate
and when it was sent twice to the court of A.C.J.M., considering
the fact that the accused are languishing in jail and have pleaded
guilty, the A.C.J.M. passed the order on sentence. The court has
found the petitioners to be guilty of having contravened Section 14
of the Act knowingly and have been sentenced to undergo simple
imprisonment for three years, setting off the period already
undergone by them in judicial custody.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
revision is limited to the question of the correctness and legality of
the sentence. The court while awarding the sentence has taken into
consideration irrelevant factors as being aggravating factors to
award sentence of three years out of a maximum sentence of five
years prescribed, wherein no minimum sentence has been
prescribed. The petitioners have already undergone two years six
months in custody out of three years awarded by the trial court.
8. Learned counsel submits that the bona fides of the
petitioners is evident, and identity established from the fact that
they were carrying their passports and voter cards issued by the
Federal Republic of Nigeria. It is further submitted that no Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
dangerous article has been recovered from the petitioners.
Possession of the currency, mobile phones, clothes and articles of
use cannot be considered to be in any way offensive. The court
while passing order on the sentence has taken into consideration
the fact that the petitioners have contravened Section 14 of the Act
during election period. This fact, as per counsel for the petitioners,
is hardly relevant. The offence to which the petitioners have
admitted their guilt and for which they have been punished is
violation of Section 14 of the Act. The fact that they were illegally
within the Indian territory during election is not a relevant factor
while granting sentence under Section 14 of the Act and therefore
consideration of the same is wholly unwarranted.
9. Mr. B.N. Pandey, learned APP has appeared on behalf
of the State. He has submitted that for contravention of Section 14
of the Act, the prescribed punishment is upto five years. For
violation of the said provision, the petitioners have been convicted,
based on their own confession. The sentence of three years'
imprisonment as has been awarded by the trial court based on their
confession and admission of guilt, therefore the same does not
require any interference. However, the fact that the petitioners
have neither been proceeded against or found guilty of any offence
under the Representation of the People Act or on account of Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
possessing of any foreign currency, cannot be denied based on the
records.
10. On these points, there is also no confession of the
petitioners, as is apparent from the order of the trial court.
11. This Court would find force in the submission of
the petitioners' counsel. Sentence has been awarded only under
Section 14 of the Act. Petitioners have not been alleged or found to
be indulging in any offence under the Representation of the People
Act or any other offence under any other Act. They have also not
been alleged to be violating or tried for any offence in respect of
possession of any illegal article whatsoever.
12. Purely based on confession of their guilt of having
violated Section 14 of the Act, sentence has been awarded by the
trial court. The judgment, however, manifests consideration of the
fact that contravention is during election time and that they were
having some Indian and foreign currency in their possession.
13. Conviction is based only on confession and
admission of guilt is for contravention of Section 14 of the
Foreigner Act. This Court is of the opinion that consideration of
the other factors that offence was committed during election, or
that they were in possession of currency, is not relevant. Also there Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
is also nothing on record to show that the petitioners are bearing
any criminal antecedents.
14. From bare perusal of Section 14 of the Act, it is
apparent that minimum sentence has not been prescribed and
maximum five years with fine has been prescribed as punishment
for violation of the said provisions. Fact that they were found
within the territory of India during election and that they were
possessing some currency cannot be considered to be an
aggravating circumstance since the petitioners have neither been
charged, or tried for any offence based on these two facts and
circumstances. The sentence which has been passed based on
consideration of these irrelevant facts therefore is illegal, incorrect
and is unsustainable.
15. This Court is of the opinion that the period of
sentence undergone is sufficient to meet the ends of justice for the
offence of violation of Section 14 of the Act.
16. Affirming the judgment of conviction, the sentence
awarded to the petitioners is reduced to the period already
undergone.
17. With limited modification, as above, the revision
application is allowed.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.213 of 2020 dt.08-10-2021
18. This Court would expect that the petitioners'
counsel would honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings
regarding supply of the requisite court fee etc. within two weeks
from the date he is called upon to do so by the office.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM
AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 09.10.2021
Transmission Date 09.10.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!