Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Juno Bitumix Private Limited vs State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 2845 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2845 Patna
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2021

Patna High Court
Juno Bitumix Private Limited vs State Of Bihar on 30 June, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7609 of 2021
     ======================================================

Juno Bitumix Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 having its office at A-3, 2nd Floor, Luv Kush Tower, Exhibition Road, Patna through its Manager, Prabhat Ranjan Jha (Male), (aged about 41 years), Son of Shri Satya Narayan Jha, Resident of Village Amanpur, Post Charaut, Charaut, P.S. Charaut, Sitamarhi, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State of Bihar through the Commissioner of State Tax, having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. Addl. Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central Division, Patna, Bihar.

3. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Special Circle, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.D.V.Pathy, Advocate Mr. Sadashiv Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.)

Date : 30-06-2021

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

"i) the order dated 28.08.2019 (as contained in Annexure -3) for the period April 2019 passed by the respondent no. 3 under section 62 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter called the BGST Act) without service of Patna High Court CWJC No.7609 of 2021 dt.30-06-2021

notice under section 46 of the BGST Act the quashed.

ii) the summary of order dated 28.08.2019 (as contained in Annexure -2) for the tax period April 2019 passed by the respondent no. 3 in Form GST DRC 07 without service of notice under section 46 of the BGST Act the quashed.

iii) the order dated 04.09.2020 (as contained in Annexure -6) for the tax period April 2019 passed by the respondent no. 2 dismissing the appeal on the solitary ground of delay in filing of the appeal be quashed.

iv) For granting any other relief(s) to which the petitioner is otherwise found entitled to."

It is brought to our notice that vide impugned order

dated 04.09.2020 passed by the Respondent No. 2 namely the

Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central

Division, Patna, Bihar in Appeal Case No. AD10082404215,

the appeal of the petitioner against the order dated 28.08.2019

passed by Respondent No. 3, namely Deputy Commissioner

of State Tax, Special Circle, Patna in GSTIN

10AACCJ1657K1ZS, under Section 62 of Bihar Goods and

Service Tax Act, 2017; and summary of order in Form GST

DRC-07 dated 28.08.2019, for the tax period April 2019 in

Form GST DRC-07, has been rejected merely on the grounds Patna High Court CWJC No.7609 of 2021 dt.30-06-2021

of being barred by limitation. Both the orders were ex parte in

nature.

In our considered view, the delay stands sufficiently

explained on account of COVID restrictions.

Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has no

objection if the matter is remanded to the Assessing Authority

for deciding the case afresh. Also, the case shall be decided on

merits. Also, during pendency of the case, no coercive steps

shall be taken against the petitioner.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

However, having heard learned counsel for the parties

as also perused the record made available, we are of the

considered view that this Court, notwithstanding the statutory

remedy, is not precluded from interfering where, ex facie, we

form an opinion that the order is bad in law. This we say so,

for two reasons- (a) violation of principles of natural justice,

i.e. Fair opportunity of hearing. No sufficient time was

afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed

ex parte in nature, does not assign any sufficient reasons even

decipherable from the record, as to how the officer could

determine the amount due and payable by the assessee. The

order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles Patna High Court CWJC No.7609 of 2021 dt.30-06-2021

of natural justice, entails civil consequences. As such, on this

short ground alone, we dispose of the present writ petition in

the following mutually agreeable terms:

(a) We quash and set aside the impugned order dated

04.09.2020 passed by the Respondent No. 2 namely the

Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central

Division, Patna, Bihar in Appeal Case No. AD10082404215,

the appeal of the petitioner against the order dated 28.08.2019

passed by Respondent No. 3, namely Deputy Commissioner of

State Tax, Special Circle, Patna in GSTIN

10AACCJ1657K1ZS, under Section 62 of Bihar Goods and

Service Tax Act, 2017; and summary of order in Form GST

DRC-07 dated 28.08.2019, for the tax period April 2019 in

Form GST DRC-07;

(b) We accept the statement of the petitioner that ten

per cent of the total amount, being condition prerequisite for

hearing of the appeal, already stands deposited. If that were so,

well and good. However, if the amount is not deposited for

whatever reason(s), same shall be done before the next date;

(c) Further the petitioner undertakes to additionally

deposit ten per cent of the amount of the demand raised

before the Assessing Officer. This shall be done within four Patna High Court CWJC No.7609 of 2021 dt.30-06-2021

weeks.

(d) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the

respective rights and contention of the parties and subject to

the order passed by the Assessing Officer. However, if it is

ultimately found that the petitioner's deposit is in excess,

the same shall be refunded within two months from the date

of passing of the order;

(e) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of the

bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in reference

to the proceedings, subject matter of present petition. This

shall be done immediately.

(f) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the Assessing

Authority on 9th of August, 2021 at 10:30 A.M., if possible

through digital mode;

(g) The Assessing Authority shall decide the case on

merits after complying with the principles of natural justice;

(h) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the

parties to place on record all essential documents and

materials, if so required and desired;

(i) During pendency of the case, no coercive steps

shall be taken against the petitioner.

(j) The Assessing Authority shall pass a fresh order Patna High Court CWJC No.7609 of 2021 dt.30-06-2021

only after affording adequate opportunity to all concerned,

including the writ petitioner;

(k) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to

fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take

unnecessary adjournment;

(l) The Assessing Authority shall decide the case on

merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two

months from the date of appearance of the petitioner;

(m) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge

the order, if required and desired;

(n) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take

recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available

in accordance with law;

(o) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes

recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate forum,

the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law, with a

reasonable dispatch;

(p) We have not expressed any opinion on merits

and all issues are left open;

(q) If possible, proceedings during the time of

current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through digital

mode;

Patna High Court CWJC No.7609 of 2021 dt.30-06-2021

The instant petition sands disposed of in the

aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands

disposed of.

Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to

communicate the order to the appropriate authority through

electronic mode.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

( S. Kumar, J)

K.C.Jha/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date          07.07.2021
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter