Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 584 Patna
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36939 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2019 Thana- ROHTAS District- Rohtas
======================================================
Dhiraj Chauhan @ Billa, aged about 23 years, male, Son of Vijay Chauhan R/O Village Sundar Ganj, PS- Rohtas, District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2021
Heard Mr. Rajendra Kumar Deo, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the
State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Rohtas
PS Case No. 296 of 2019 dated 15.11.2019, instituted under
Section 30(a) the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that when the
police reached the place of occurrence, one person ran away and
they recovered 30 litres mahua liquor and one motorcycle along
with mobile from the spot and it transpired that the petitioner
was the person who had fled away.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36939 of 2020 dt.02-02-2021
has been falsely implicated as there is no eye witness and only
on hearsay information. It was submitted that no recovery has
been made from the possession of the petitioner or from any
property owned by him. It was submitted that the petitioner is in
custody since 20.06.2020.
5. Learned APP submitted that the petitioner has three
other cases against him.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the
petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2 nd Additional
District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas, Sasaram-cum-Special
Court Excise, Rohtas, Sasaram in Rohtas PS Case No. 296 of
2019, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be
a close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the
bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the
petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also give an
undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any
illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory
provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses.
Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36939 of 2020 dt.02-02-2021
undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds. The
petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the
Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or being
absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall
also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.
7. The application stands disposed off in the
aforementioned terms.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/-
AFR/NAFR U T
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!