Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Baby Kumari vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 5965 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5965 Patna
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2021

Patna High Court
Baby Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 8 December, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4516 of 2020
     ======================================================

Baby Kumari Wife of Pawan Singh, Resident of Village- Sokhodevara, Ward No. 11, Police Station- Kawakol, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector -Cum-District Magistrate, Nawada.

4. The District Program Officer, Nawada.

5. The Lady Supervisor, Kawakol, District- Nawada.

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Kawakol Block, District- Nawada.

7. The Ward Member of Ward No. 11, Sokhodevara Panchayat , Police Station-

Kawakol, District- Nawada, Pin code- 805106

8. Usha Kumari, Wife of Jitendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-

Sokhodevara Ward No. 01, Police Station- Kawakol, District- Nawada, Pin code- 805106

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Kumari Amrita (GP 3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-12-2021

Heard learned counsels for respective parties.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following reliefs:-

"(i) For quashing of part of the order contained in Memo No.-3 dated 02.01.2020 issued under the Signature of District Magistrate, Nawada wherein observation has been made with regard to selection process of Aanganwadi Sevika at Center No.-130 and canceled the selection Patna High Court CWJC No.4516 of 2020 dt.08-12-2021

of this Petitioner and further directed for afresh selection.

(ii) For issuance of direction upon the respondent authorities to held the selection of the Petitioner is a valid one, treating it after full compliance of the procedure made by the state authorities.

(iii) For direction upon the authorities to hand over the charge and release the salary and other emoluments to run the center no.- 130.

(iv) For grant of relief/reliefs for which the petitioner found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances in this case."

Petitioner was stated to have been appointed to the post

of Annganwadi Sevika at Center No. 130 and her services have

been terminated and she preferred an appeal. The appellate

authority is stated to have confirmed the order of termination,

hence the present petition.

Perusal of the order of termination, it is evident that the

petitioner has not been heard in the matter before her termination

and it is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. State

counsel has gone through the order of termination and it is not

disputed by him.

In the light of these facts and circumstances one short

ground that termination is without notice to the petitioner.

Termination order is to be set aside. Accordingly, termination order Patna High Court CWJC No.4516 of 2020 dt.08-12-2021

dated 02.01.2020 (Annexure-8) passed by the appellate authority,

i.e., District Magistrate, Nawada is set aside reserving liberty to

the concerned respondent to initiate appropriate proceedings like

issuance of notice or holding inquiry against petitioner and

proceed to pass appropriate order after due consideration or

petitioner's plea within a period of six months from the date of

receipt of this order.

In the meanwhile, the concerned respondent is hereby

directed to take back the petitioner to the post. Monetary benefits

during the intervening period from the date of termination till

reinstatement shall be calculated and disbursed in favour of the

petitioner within a period of two months from today failing which

the petitioner is entitled to interest @ 6% per annum. The interest

shall be recovered from the concerned official who is liable to

implement the order beyond the time limit stipulated in the present

order.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition

stands disposed off.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Vikash/-

AFR/NAFR               NAFR
CAV DATE               N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date      N/A
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter