Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anup Kumar Garanaik vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1465 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1465 Ori
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Anup Kumar Garanaik vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ... on 17 February, 2026

Author: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                          W.P.(C) No.5095 of 2026
          Anup Kumar Garanaik                    ....             Petitioner

                                             Mr. R. Samal, Advocate

                                     -versus-

          State of Odisha & Others               ....        Opp. Parties

                                                     Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC

                            CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Order                              ORDER
 No.                             17.02.2026

 01.     1.     This   matter   is   taken      up    through      Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Petitioner is grieving before the Writ Court against non-consideration of her representation dated 17.10.2025 under Annexure-7, wherein she has sought for the grant of Grade Pay Rs.4,600/- the date of completion of twenty years of service in a single cadre towards 3rd Financial Up-gradation under RACP/MACP Scheme given to other similarly circumstanced teachers.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the claim of the Petitioner is supported by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT) decision in O.A.

No.2576 of 2016 has been affirmed by Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.7281 of 2018 between State of Odisha & Ors. v. Saraswati Bhoi & Ors., 2022 (II) ILR-CUT-629. He also notifies to the Court that the said decision has been affirmed by the Apex Court.

4. Learned ASC appearing for the Opposite Parties very fairly submits that he would instruct to OP No.1 to take the decision in the matter in terms of the representation, if all contentions are kept open and a timeline is prescribed. This is appreciable.

5. In the above circumstances, writ petition is disposed of. Time for consideration of the subject representation and informing result of such consideration to the Petitioner in writing, is eight weeks. All contentions are kept open. The consideration shall be made in the light of Saraswati Bhoi supra and also State of Odisha and others v. Nilamani Behera and others in W.P.(C) No.4848 of 2021.

6. It is open to the answering OP No.1 to solicit any information or documents from the side of the Petitioner, as required for taking a decision on the subject representation. However, in that guise delay shall not be brooked.

7. Now, no costs.

Web copy of this order to be acted upon by all concerned.

(Aditya Kumar Mohapatra) Judge

amit

Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter