Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

*** vs State Of Odisha & Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 8632 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8632 Ori
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

*** vs State Of Odisha & Others on 23 September, 2025

                 ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK




                     WP(C) No.26822 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
                            India.



                             ***

Gurudayal Singh ... Petitioner.

-VERSUS-


     State of Odisha & Others
                                    ...         Opposite Parties.



Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner         : Mr. K.N. Guru, Advocate


For the Opposite Parties : Mr. T. Kumar, Addl. Standing Counsel.

P R E S E N T:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 23.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 23.09.2025

J UDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--

1. This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner

praying for directing the District Sub-Registrar, Sambalpur

(O.P. No.3) to receive the deed for sale of the petitioner for

registration, because, the O.P. No.3 has orally refused to

receive the same. For which, the petitioner has filed this writ

petition praying for directing the Opp. Party No.3 to receive

the deed for sale of the petitioner for registration.

2. Heard from the learned counsels of both the sides.

3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrar

cannot orally refuse to receive any document, when the same

is presented for registration. He/she is either to register the

document after receiving it or to refuse to register the same

indicating the reasons for non-registration, if for any reason

under law that, the said document is not legally fit for

registration.

According to The Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa

Registration Rules, 1988, when a document is presented for

registration, it is the duty of the Sub-Registrar/District Sub-

Registrar to receive the same, but if the same is not fit for

registration as per law, the Sub-Registrar/District Sub-

Registrar may refuse to accept that document for registration

assigning the reasons in writing about the same.

4. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been

clarified in the decisions between North East Infrastructure

Private Limited and Ors. Vrs. The State of Andhra

Pradesh and Ors. reported in 2025 (2) Civ.C.C. 220

(Andhra Pradesh) that,

"the Sub-Registrar/Registrar, cannot orally refuse to receive any document presented for registration, but after receiving, he/she will consider, whether the same is legally fit for registration or not, because, Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 provides that, the Sub-Registrar is to receive a document which is presented for registration and if the same is fit for registration, he/she shall register that deed as per the Registration Act, 1908 and Rules thereof and if the same is not compliance with the provisions of law, he/she shall pass an order of refusal of registration in writing as indicated in Section 71 of the Registration Act."

5. When, in this matter at hand, the District Sub-

Registrar, Sambalpur (O.P. No.3) orally refused to receive

the deed for sale of the petitioner for registration, then, in

view of the principles of law enunciated in the ratio of the

aforesaid decision, his oral refusal to receive the deed for

sale of the petitioner cannot be held as inconformity with

the law.

6. Therefore, there is no justification under law to

disallow this writ petition filed by the petitioner.

7. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is

allowed.

8. The District Sub-Registrar, Sambalpur (O.P. No.3) is

directed to receive the deed for sale, if presented by the

petitioner annexing the certified copy of this Judgment and

to act upon the same as per The Indian Registration Act,

1908 and The Orissa Registration Rules, 1988.

If that deed is registered, then after registration, the Opp.

Party No.3 shall return that sale deed to the petitioner within

3 days of its registration after complying all the formalities

thereof as per the Rule 100 of The Orissa Registration Rules,

1988 and Notification No.2915 dated 02.08.2017 of I.G.R of

Odisha.

9. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is

disposed of finally.

(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE

High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 23 .09. 2025// Rati Ranjan Nayak Sr. Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter