Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prasanta Dandasena vs State Of Odisha
2025 Latest Caselaw 8452 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8452 Ori
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

Prasanta Dandasena vs State Of Odisha on 19 September, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            CRLA No. 639 of 2016

       Prasanta Dandasena                   .....      Appellants/Petitioners

                                                     Mr. Julu Khansama,
                                                     Advocate

                                         -versus-

       State of Odisha                      .....    Respondent/Opp. Party

                                                     Ms. Suvalaxmi Devi,
                                                     Addl. Standing Counsel

                             CORAM:
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. MISHRA

                                       ORDER
Order No.                             19.09.2025
                                 I.A. No. 1169 of 2025
 13.              This is an application for bail.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.

The appellant-petitioner has been convicted under sections 376D/120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 66E and 67B of the I.T. Act, and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life means the remainder of the persons natural life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs) in default, to undergo R.I. for two years for the offence under section 376D/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, to undergo R.I. for one year for the offence under Section 66E of the I.T. Act, 2000 and to undergo R.I. for three years and to pay

a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs), in default, to undergo R.I. for six months under Section 67B of I.T. Act, 2000/120-B of Indian Penal Code. He was not sentenced under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, as it prescribes lesser punishment than the punishment prescribed under Section 376D of IPC. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently by the learned District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Special Court), Sambalpur in S.T. Case No. 219 of 2014.

Perused the impugned judgment.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant was taken into judicial custody since 20.10.2014 and during the trial he was never released on bail and during pendency of the appeal, he was directed to be released on interim bail for a period of three months vide order dated 29.07.2024. He further submits that the appellant has not taken part in the commission of rape as per the evidence of the victim and three of the co-accused persons, namely, Muna Oram, Ranjan Oram and Jayamangal Pradhan has been directed to be released on bail by this Court and he has filed the copies of the order, which are taken on record. He has also filed the custody certificate of the appellant, which is taken on record.

The learned counsel for the State though submits that nothing adverse has been reported against the appellant during the interim bail, but the Inspector-in-charge, Mahalia Police Station has reported that the victim is now unmarried and she is studying and preparing for job and there may be like risk of the victim.

Since as per the judgment it was the co-accused persons, namely, Amir Pradhan (JCL) and Bishnu Kisan committed rape on the victim, taking into account the period of detention of the appellant in judicial custody as well as his conduct during the

period of interim bail that he has not flouted the terms and conditions, we are inclined to release the appellant-petitioner on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of his release. The appellant-petitioner shall surrender before the learned trial Court on expiry of three months period.

For the above period, let the appellant-petitioner be released on interim bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(rupees twenty thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, subject to condition that while on interim bail the appellant-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activities in any manner, he shall not try to come in contact with the victim or her family members and he shall appear before the IIC, Sason Police Station, Sambalpur once in a week on every Sunday.

Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of interim bail.

The I.A. is disposed of accordingly.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.S. Mishra) Judge

14. Put up this matter in the week commencing from 5th

January, 2026.

Learned counsel for appellant-petitioner shall file the surrender certificate of appellant on the next date.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.S. Mishra) Ashok/Swarna Judge

Designation: Senior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 20-Sep-2025 16:43:11

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter