Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tapan Kumar Sahoo vs Collector
2025 Latest Caselaw 8083 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8083 Ori
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

Tapan Kumar Sahoo vs Collector on 10 September, 2025

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                            W.P.(C) No.13575 of 2025
        (An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

        Tapan Kumar Sahoo                            ....            Petitioner
                                       -versus-
        Collector, Khurda and others                 ....      Opposite Parties
                  Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
                             (Virtual/Physical Mode):
                  For Petitioner       -       Mr. Ashok Kumar Panigrahi,
                                               Advocate.

                  For Opposite Parties-        Mr. G. Mohanty,
                                                Standing Counsel.
                                               (for O.P. Nos.1 to 3)

                  CORAM:
                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

        Date of Hearing :10.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment :10.09.2025

A.C. Behera, J.         This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

   Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for

   quashing (setting aside) the final order dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure-2)

   passed by the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revisional Court No.II,

   Bhubaneswar in R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014.

   2.    Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned SC

   for the State (O.P. Nos.1 to 3).

   3.    During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

   drew the attention of the Court to the impugned order dated 28.10.2024

   (Annexure-2) passed in R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014 and contended that,

                                                                             Page 1 of 4
 the said order has been passed for rejection of R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014

filed by the petitioner "on the ground of non-filing of the documents

concerning sabik Hal comparison, flow of title and documents relating to

possession".

      The learned SC for the State argued in support of the impugned

order contending that, the impugned order is neither illegal nor

unreasonable.

4.    The required documents relating to comparison of sabik and Hal

records and documents relating to possession are available in the

settlement office of the Addl. Commissioner, as their office is the

custodian of such records. For which, the said documents could have

been called for by the Addl. Commissioner for perusal and disposal of

R.P. No.1455 of 2014 instead of blaming to the petitioner for non-

production of the same.

            On this aspect, the propositions of law has already
            been clarified in a case between Gajendra Prasad
            Das Vrs. State of Orissa and Others reported in 2016 (2)
            O.J.R. (265) that, if the petitioner has not produced the non-
            availability certificate, it can be verified by the State
            Government being the custodian of the Government
            records, because, the State Authorities are the custodian of
            the official records.
      So, the impugned order of rejection to the R.P. Case No.1455 of

2014 on dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure-2) by the Addl. Commissioner,

Addl. Revisional Court No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of

                                                                         Page 2 of 4
 Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack only on the ground of non-production of

documents by the petitioner cannot be sustainable under law. The same is

liable to be quashed.

5.    So, there is merit in the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The

same must succeed.

6.    In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed.

      The impugned order dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure-2) passed in R.P.

Case No.1455 of 2014 by the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revisional

Court No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha,

Cuttack is quashed (set aside).

      The matter vide R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014 is remitted back

(remanded back) to the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revisional Court

No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack

for deciding the same afresh as per law within two months from the date

of appearance of the petitioner in that R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014 as per

law after giving opportunity of being heard to the parties.

      The petitioner is directed to appear before the Addl. Commissioner,

Addl. Revisional Court No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of

Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack in R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014 on dated

22.09.2025

for the purpose of receiving the directions of the said Court as

to further proceedings of that R.P. Case No.1455 of 2014.

7. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of

finally.

(A.C. Behera), Judge.

Orissa High Court, Cuttack. 10.09.2025//Binayak Sahoo// Junior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter