Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharmendra Manik vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 7886 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7886 Ori
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

Dharmendra Manik vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite ... on 4 September, 2025

Author: Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi
Bench: Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                              W.P.(C) No.24160 of 2025
                             Dharmendra Manik       .....                         Petitioner
                                                                    Mr. Sanjay Kumar Patra,
                                                                                   Advocate
                                                         -versus-
                             State of Odisha & Anr.           .....        Opposite Parties
                                                                         Mr. Pravakar Behera,
                                                                         Standing Counsel for
                                                                        Transport Department

                                                  CORAM:
                               THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI
                    Order                                  ORDER
                    No.                                   04.09.2025

                      01.        1.     This    matter    is   taken   up    through      hybrid

                                 arrangement.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the

Petitioner with the following prayer:

"Therefore, the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased enough to admit this writ petition, issue rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the VCRs under Annexure-2 series issued /drawn against the Vehicle of the petitioner bearing Regd. No. OD02BU9989 shall be transmitted to the Court of learned J.M.F.C.(Transport), Cuttack for disposal of the same as per law, And if the Opposite Parties do not show cause or show

Digitally Signed Page 1 of 4.

insufficient cause the rule may be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ directing the O.P No.2 to transmit/forward the VCRs under Annexure-2 series to the Court of learned J.M.F.C.(Transport), Cuttack within a stipulated time;

And further, be pleased to pass any appropriate writ(s)/order(s), direction(s) as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the facts & circumstances of the case

And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray."

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this

Court has earlier decided the similar issue in the

judgment dated 15.01.2014 passed in W.P.(C) No.1500 of

2004 (Anjana Babulal Darabad vrs. Commissioner, S.T.A.

& Ors.) and batch of Writ Petitions. Hence, he submits

that this Writ Petition may be disposed of in the light of

the judgment passed in the case of Anjana Babulal

(supra).

5. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that

they have no objection, if this matter is disposed of in the

light of the judgment passed in the case of Anjana

Babulal (supra).

6. On perusal of the records and the judgment passed in

the case of Anjana Babulal (supra), it appears that similar

issue has already been decided by this Court in the said

Digitally Signed Page 2 of 4.

judgment which was disposed of on 15.01.2014. The

ordering portion of the said judgment is as follows:

" xxx xxx xxx

v) Pending such approval, direction is hereby given to the OMVD Officers issuing the VCR to direct the driver/owner/person in possession and control of motor vehicle either compound the offence on payment of prescribed fine offline/online or to appear before the STA/RTA and produce the demanded documents for disposal of VCR within fifteen days, failing which the VCR issuing officer will submit prosecution report before the court having jurisdiction, namely, Transport Magistrate/J.M.F.C./ S.D.J.M. for adjudication of the VCR within fifteen days from the date on which compounded fine was to be paid. The Transport Magistrate/ JMFC/SDJM may allow compounding of the offences, strictly in conformity with the Gazattee Notification No. No.1151 dated 29.09.1995. As prescribed under Rule 139 of C.M.V. Rules, 1989, the owners/driver/conductor may also send Xerox coy of R.C./I.C./Permit/D.L. and any other relevant documents duly attested by Police Officer or any other officer to the officer who demanded the documents by registered post within fifteen days from the date of issue of VCR.

xx x xx x x "

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the parties and taking into account the

Digitally Signed Page 3 of 4.

judgment passed in the case of Anjana Babulal (supra),

this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Opposite

Party No.2 to transmit the V.C.Rs under Annexure-2

series in respect of vehicle No.OD02BU9989 to the court

of learned J.M.F.C. (Transport), Cuttack for disposal as

per law.

8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi) Judge

Gitanjali

Digitally Signed Page 4 of 4.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter