Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harmohan Mansingh vs State Of Odisha And Another .... ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 7774 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7774 Ori
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

Harmohan Mansingh vs State Of Odisha And Another .... ... on 2 September, 2025

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                      W.P.(C) No.23797 of 2025
        (An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)


        Harmohan Mansingh                                 ....             Petitioner
                                           -versus-
        State of Odisha and another                       ....      Opposite Parties
                 Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
                                (Virtual/Physical Mode):

                  For Petitioner           -       Mr. M. Panigrahi,
                                                   Advocate.

                  For Opposite Parties           - Mr. G. Mohanty,
                                                   Standing Counsel


                  CORAM:
                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing and Judgment :02.09.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for

directing the Sub-Registrar, Bolagarh in the District of Khurda (O.P.

No.2) to accept the deed for sale.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrar cannot orally

refuse to receive any document, when the same is presented for

registration. He/she is either to register the document or to refuse to

register the same indicating the reasons for non-registration, if that

document is not legally fit for registration.

According to The Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa

Registration Rules, 1988, when a document is presented for registration,

it is the duty of the Sub-Registrar to receive the same, but if the said

document is not in compliance with the provisions of law, the Sub-

Registrar may refuse to accept that document for registration assigning

the reasons in writing about the same.

4. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified in

a decision between North East Infrastructure Private Limited and Ors.

Vrs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. reported in 2025 (2)

Civ.C.C. 220 (Andhra Pradesh) that,

The Sub-Registrar/Registrar, cannot orally refuse to receive the document and would consider the fitness of it for registration or otherwise. Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 empowers the Registration Authorities to receive a document which is presented for registration and process the same, and thereafter, either register such sale deed or any other document or pass a refusal order.

5. Section 44 of the T.P. Act, 1882 provides inherent right/power to a

co-sharer of a joint property like the petitioner to transfer/alienate his/her

undivided share in the joint property without the consent of his co-sharer

or co-sharers and Sub-Registrar has no power to refuse to receive the sale

deed, if presented for registration by a co-sharer like the petitioner in this

matter even if the said deed for sale is executed without the consent of his

co-sharers.

On this aspect the propositions of law has already been clarified in

the decision between Damodar Mishra Vs. State of Odisha & Others

decided on 03.04.2025 in WP(C) No.4340 of 2025.

6. So, by applying the principles of law enunciated in the ratio of the

above decisions and also taking the Rule 147 of The Orissa Registration

Rules, 1988 into account, it is felt proper to dispose of this writ petition

finally directing Sub-Registrar, Bolagarh (O.P. No.2) to receive the deed

of sale, if presented by the petitioner for registration with the certified

copy of this Judgment and to act upon the same as per The Indian

Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa Registration Rules, 1988 in

accordance with the principles of law enunciated in the ratio of the above

decisions. If the said deed is registered, then, after registration of the

same, the Sub-Registrar, Bolagarh (O.P. No.2) shall return that sale deed

to the petitioner within 3 days of its registration after complying all the

formalities thereof as per the Rule 100 of The Orissa Registration Rules,

1988 and Notification No.2915 dated 02.08.2017 of I.G.R of Odisha.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of

finally.

Digitally Signed                                                              (A.C. Behera),
Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK                                                         Judge.
Reason: Authentication
                    Orissa High Court, Cuttack.
Location: High Court02.09.2025//Utkalika
                      of Orissa, Nayak// Cuttack
                    Junior Stenographer
Date: 02-Sep-2025 18:24:43




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter