Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Badal Bindhani vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party
2025 Latest Caselaw 9429 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9429 Ori
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2025

Orissa High Court

Badal Bindhani vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party on 27 October, 2025

Author: G. Satapathy
Bench: G. Satapathy
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                   CRLREV NO.354 of 2025

   (An application U/S. 438/442 of BNSS, 2023 r/w Sec.
   102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
   Children) Act, 2015.

   Badal Bindhani            ....                 Petitioner
                            -versus-
   State of Odisha            ....           Opposite Party

   For Petitioner      :          Mr. A.Mishra, Advocate


   For Opposite        :          Mr. R.B.Mishra, Addl.PP
   Party

       CORAM:
                   JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

  F DATE OF HEARING & JUDGMENT:27.10.2025 (ORAL)

G. Satapathy, J.

1. This criminal revision U/S. 102 of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,

2015 (in short "the Act") is directed against the

impugned order dated 28.05.2025 passed by the

learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-PO, Children's

Court, Keonjhar in Criminal Appeal No. 07 of 2025

confirming the order dated 18.04.2025 passed by the

learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board,

Keonjhar in JJC Case No. 32 of 2025 arising out of

Town PS Case No. 193 of 2025 refusing to grant bail

to the revision-petitioner, who is child in conflict with

law(CICL) for commission of offence punishable U/Ss.

137(2)/87/64(2)(m) of BNS & Sec. 6 of POCSO Act, on

the main allegation of committing rape and

penetrative sexual assault upon the victim.

2. Heard, Mr. Arijeet Mishra, learned counsel

for the revision-petitioner and Mr.R.B.Mishra, learned

Addl. PP and perused the record. None appears for the

victim despite being duly informed as apprised by the

learned Addl. PP.

3. Although this Court has called for the

Social Investigation Report of the CICL, but that is yet

to be submitted and only Social Background Report of

the CICL has been submitted. It appears that the

concerned officer is careless and negligent since the

order was passed on 31.07.2025 for submission of SIR

and SBR, but the SIR is yet to be submitted. This

Court, therefore, is constrained to pass this order in

absence of SIR because bail to child-in-conflict with

law is the rule, but its detention is an exception. On

careful scrutiny of the impugned orders passed by the

Board in original case and the PO, Children's Court in

Appeal, it appears that bail has been refused to the

CICL on the ground that his release would defeat the

ends of justice, but fact remains that there is no

discussion as to how the release of the CICL would

defeat the ends of justice, more particularly when it is

stated by the Board that the CICL had developed

intimacy with the victim. Sec.12 of the Act mandates

release of the CICL on bail, but its proviso carves out

an exception for grounds to refuse bail to the CICL. In

this case, the impugned order does not reveal about

refusal of bail to the CICL on the ground that there are

reasonable grounds for believing that release of the

CICL would bring him into association with any known

criminal or expose him to moral, physical or

psychological danger. However, the allegation on

record reveals teen age infatuation, but granting bail

to CICL in this case can never be considered about

misplaced sympathy, more particularly when he is

detained in Observation Home since 13.04.2025 with

submission of charge sheet in the meantime. In view

of the aforesaid facts and taking into consideration the

materials placed on record and the rule being for

release of the CICL on bail, this Court considers it

proper to admit the CICL to bail.

4. In the result, the criminal revision stands

allowed on contest, but in the circumstance, there is

no order as to cost. Consequently, the impugned

order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-

cum-PO, Children's Court, Keonjhar is hereby set

aside, so also the order passed the learned Principal

Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Keonjhar in JJC

Case No. 32 of 2025 arising out of Town PS Case No.

193 of 2025 in refusing bail to the CICL. As a

necessary corollary, the revision-petitioner-cum-CICL

be admitted to bail by the forum/Court in seisin over

the matter on such terms and conditions as deems fit

and proper.

5. Accordingly, the CRLREV stands disposed of.

(G. Satapathy) Judge

Orissa High Court, Cuttack, Dated the 27th October, 2025/Kishore

Signed by: KISHORE KUMAR SAHOO

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 28-Oct-2025 10:06:03

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter