Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhikari Pradhan vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 9295 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9295 Ori
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2025

Orissa High Court

Bhikari Pradhan vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 23 October, 2025

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                  W.P.(C) No.26400 of 2025

              (An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)



              Bhikari Pradhan                              ....            Petitioner
                                             -versus-
              State of Odisha and others                   ....      Opposite Parties


                        Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
                                   (Virtual/Physical Mode):
                       For Petitioner        -       Mr. Umakant Sahoo,
                                                     Advocate.

                       For Opposite Parties-         Mr. Tej Kumar,
                                                     Learned Additional Sanding Counsel

                       CORAM:
                       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA
              Date of Hearing :23.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment :23.10.2025

A.C. Behera, J.        This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under

         Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for

         directing the Sub-Registrar, Nuagaon Tahasil (Opposite Party No.3) in

         the district of Nayagarh to receive the deed for sale (original of

         Annexure-2) of the petitioner for registration, because, the Sub-Registrar,

         Nuagaon Tahasil (Opposite Party No.3) orally refused to receive that

         deed for sale of the petitioner for registration.

         2.       Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

         Standing Counsel for the State.
                                                                                   Page 1 of 3
 3.    The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrars like Opposite

Party No.3 i.e. Sub-Registrar, Nuagaon in the District of Nayagarh cannot

orally refuse to receive any document, when the same is presented for

registration. He/she is either to register the document or to refuse to

register the same indicating the reasons for non-registration, if that

document is not legally fit for registration.

      According to The Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa

Registration Rules, 1988, when a document is presented for registration,

it is the duty of the Sub-Registrar to receive the same, but if the said

document is not in compliance with the provisions of law, the Sub-

Registrar may refuse to accept that document for registration assigning

the reasons in writing about such refusal.

4.    On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified in

a decision between North East Infrastructure Private Limited and Ors.

vrs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. reported in 2025 (2) Civ.C.C.

220 (Andhra Pradesh) and in a case between Antaryami Nayak vrs.

State of Odisha & Others in WP(C) No.18548 of 2025 decided on

11.07.2025

that,

"the Sub-Registrar/Registrar, cannot orally refuse to receive the document and would consider the fitness of it for registration or otherwise. Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 empowers the Registration Authorities to receive a document which is presented for registration and process the same."

5. Therefore, the oral refusal of the Sub-Registrar, Nuagaon

(Opposite Party No.3) to receive the deed for sale (original of

Annexure-2) of the petitioner for registration cannot be held legal in

view of the propositions of law enunciated in the ratio of the above

decision.

For which, there is no justification under law to disallow the

writ petition filed by the petitioner.

6. Therefore, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is to be

allowed.

7. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed.

The Sub-Registrar, Nuagaon (Opposite Party No.3) is directed

to receive the deed for sale (original of Annexure-2) of the petitioner,

if the same is presented by the petitioner annexing the certified copy

of this judgment and to act upon the same as per The Registration Act,

1908 and The Orissa Registration Rules, 1988.

If the said deed (original of Annexure-2) is registered, then, after

registration of the same, the Sub-Registrar, Nuagaon Tahasil (Opposite

Party No.3) shall return that sale deed to the petitioner within 3(three)

days of its registration after complying all the formalities thereof as per

the Rule 100 of The Orissa Registration Rules, 1988 and Notification

No.2915 dated 02.08.2017 of I.G.R of Odisha.

8. As such, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of finally.

Digitally Signed Judge

Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Orissa High Court, Cuttack Location: OHC, CUTTACK The 23rd of October, 2025/ Jagabandhu, P.A. Date: 23-Oct-2025 21:25:02

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter