Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5473 Ori
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
F.A.O. No. 480 of 2024
Dillip Kumar Biswal & Ors. ........ Petitioner(s)
Mr. Satyaban Sahoo, Adv.
-Versus-
Union of India .......... Opposite Parties
Mr. Alok Kumar Mohanty, Sr. Panel Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
27.03.2025 Order No. I.A. No.889 of 2024
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. This application has been filed for condoning the delay of 4
days in preferring the Appeal.
3. Heard.
4. Considering the submissions and on going through the
averments made in this I.A., prayer is allowed. Delay in
preferring the Appeal is, hereby, condoned.
5. I.A. is disposed of.
1. The present appeal at the instance of the claimants/ appellants
Signed by: LITARAM MURMU is directed against the judgment dated 5.07.2024 passed by the Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 28-Mar-2025 18:07:03
learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench,
Bhubaneswar in Case No.OA(IIU)/143/2019.
2. Heard.
3. The brief fact of the case is that on 11.06.2019 the deceased
Harihar Biswal was travelling by Jajpur-Kharagpur passenger
train from JJKR road to Bhadrak railway station and during
course of journey, on the way in between Manjuri road and
Kenduapada railway station, due to jerk of the train supported
by push and pull of passengers, the deceased accidentally fell
down from the said train, sustained injury and died on the spot.
It is stated that based on the information given by SM,
Kenduapada station, GRPS, Bhadrak, has registered an UD case
No.14/2019 and took up investigation. It is stated that on the
date of incident, the deceased was a bona fide passenger and
purchase of journey ticket and boarding of train by the deceased
was witnessed by the son of the deceased but the said ticket was
lost in the alleged incident.
4. Learned counsel for the Appellants submits that the learned
Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- in favour of the
Appellants. However, the Appellants were permitted to
withdraw only 10% of the awarded amount each. He further
Digitally Signed submits that since the Appellants are suffering from various
Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 28-Mar-2025 18:07:03
diseases, they may be permitted to withdraw the entire awarded
amount.
5. In such view of the matter, this Court modifies only that part
of the judgment dated 5.07.2024 passed by the learned Railway
Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case
No.OA(IIU)/143/2019 and directs that the Appellants /claimants
will be permitted to withdraw 50% of their share as awarded in
the judgment dated 5.07.2024.
6. This FAO is, accordingly, disposed of.
( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
Murmu
Designation: Personal Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!