Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tutu Guni vs Respondent/
2025 Latest Caselaw 5423 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5423 Ori
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2025

Orissa High Court

Tutu Guni vs Respondent/ on 27 March, 2025

Author: S.K. Sahoo
Bench: S.K. Sahoo
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                             CRLA No.996 of 2022

               Tutu Guni                            ....        Appellant/
                                                              Petitioner

                                   Mr. A.K. Moharana,
                                   Advocate

                                      -versus-
                                                          Respondent/
               State of Odisha                      ....    Opp. Party

                                   Mr. Jateswar Nayak,
                                   Addl. Govt. Advocate

                                      CORAM:
                      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

                                       ORDER
Order No.                            27.03.2025

                                  I.A. No.247 of 2025
   03.              This    matter    is    taken        up     through     Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical Mode).

This is an application under section 389 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant- petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Perused the impugned judgment.

The appellant-petitioner has been convicted for commission of the offence punishable under section 302/34 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo

imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand), in default, to undergo R.I. for a period of six months by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar vide judgment and order dated 04.07.2022 passed in C.T. Case No.153 of 2012.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was taken into judicial custody in connection with this case on 07.07.2012 and thereafter, he was never released on bail and as such, he has remained in judicial custody for more than twelve and half years. Learned counsel further submitted that the case is based on circumstantial evidence and the occurrence stated to have taken place on 10.05.2012 and the first information report was lodged on 14.07.2012 and the deceased died on 18.08.2012. Learned counsel further submitted that the appeal is of the year, 2022 and there is no likelihood of the appeal being taken up for hearing in the near future and in view of the available material on record, there are good chances of success in the appeal and balance of convenience lies in his favour and therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, opposed the prayer for bail and placed the evidence of the doctor (P.W.1), who conducted the post mortem examination and opined that the cause of death was due to dehydration, shock due to burn. Learned counsel

further submitted that there is dying declaration of the deceased and the deceased herself lodged the first information report in which she has also stated that the petitioner, who set her on fire while she was sleeping in the night and none of the in-laws tried to rescue her.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature of evidence adduced during trial, the manner in which the death took place and particularly, the post mortem report finding, while not inclining to release the petitioner on bail on merit, but taking into account his period of detention in judicial custody for more than twelve and half years and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, we are inclined to release the petitioner on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of release and the petitioner shall surrender before the learned trial Court immediately on expiry of the three months period.

For the above period, let the appellant-petitioner be released on interim bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court subject to condition that he shall not indulge in any criminal activities while on interim bail.

Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of interim bail.

The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.K. Mishra) Judge

04. This is an application for stay of realization of fine.

Heard.

There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned trial Court on the appellant- petitioner till disposal of the criminal appeal.

Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

( S.K. Mishra) Judge

05. List this matter in the week commencing from 07.07.2025. Learned counsel for the appellant shall

produce the surrender certificate of the appellant on the next date.

Issue certified copy as per rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

(S.K. Mishra) Judge RKM

Signed by: RABINDRA KUMAR MISHRA

Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 28-Mar-2025 17:06:44

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter