Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5082 Ori
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.31157 of 2024
Baikunthanath Rout ..... Petitioner
Represented By Adv. -
Tushar Kanta Nayak
-versus-
State Of Odisha and another ..... Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. -
Bigyan Kumar Sharma,
S. K. Singh, I. Tripathy,
R. Sahoo, Mr. Samaresh
Jena, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
MOHAPATRA
ORDER
18.03.2025 Order No.
03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. B.K. Sharma, learned senior counsel for the Opposite Party-Corporation. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:
"It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application, issue Notice to the Opposite parties,
and after hearing the concerned parties, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ / writs directing to the Opp.Parties, more particularly the Opp.Party No.2-Managing Director Odisha Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd, Bhubaneswar to release the retiral benefits such as death-cum-retirement gratuity, annual increments and leave encashment taking into judgment dtd.08.11.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.30151 of 2020 and also sanction the interest due to delay on payment of retiral dues to the Petitioner within a stipulated period.
And/or this Hon'ble Court may pass any other appropriate order as it deems fit and proper;"
4. Considering the prayer of the Petitioner involved in the present writ petition, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the writ application by granting liberty to the Petitioner to first approach the Opposite Party-2 who is the competent authority to take a decision in the matter. Accordingly, the Petitioner is directed to approach the Opposite Party No.2 by filing a fresh and detailed representation taking therein all the grounds with all supporting documents within two weeks from today. In such eventuality, the Opposite Party No.2 shall do well to consider and dispose of the representation of the Petitioner strictly in accordance with law and the rules applicable within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of such representation along with a certified copy of today's order. The Opposite Party No.2 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The final decision so taken be communicated to the Petitioner within ten days
thereafter. It is open to the Petitioner to rely upon any judgment in support of his contention, in such eventuality, the Opposite Party No.2 shall consider the same while disposing of the representation of the Petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.
( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra )
Judge
S.K. Rout
Reason: Authentication Page 3 of 3.
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Mar-2025 10:07:05
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!