Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4557 Ori
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CVREV No.249 of 1998
Badani Dei and others Petitioners
None
-versus-
Life Insurance Corporation of .... Opposite Party(s)
India, Ltd., represented through its
Divisional Manager, Division
Office, Cuttack and others
Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Advocate appearing
on behalf of Mr. S.P. Mishra, Sr.
Advocate for O.P. No.1 and 2
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA
ORDER
Order No. 03.03.2025
05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
/Physical Mode).
2. None appears from the side of the petitioners.
3. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2 is present.
4. As per the ratio of the decision in the case of Hukumchand Amolikchand Logde vrs. Madhava Balaji Potdar and another reported in 1984 Supp. SCC-600, once a revision is admitted, the same must be disposed of on merit, even on failure of the petitioners to appear. For which, in absence of the learned counsel for the petitioners, heard from the learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2.
5. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2 submitted that, this revision has arisen out of Title Appeal No.31 of 1995 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Khurda.
6. Heard from the learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2.
7. Put up for judgment.
( A.C. Behera ) Judge Jagabandhu
Designation: Personal Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!