Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramesh Chandra Dalai vs The Commissioner
2025 Latest Caselaw 6252 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6252 Ori
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2025

Orissa High Court

Ramesh Chandra Dalai vs The Commissioner on 24 June, 2025

             ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

                     WP(C) No. 28784 of 2020

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
                            India.
                            ***

Ramesh Chandra Dalai ............. Petitioner

-VERSUS-

The Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement, ............. Opposite Parties Cuttack and others

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : Mr. D.Nayak, Advocate.

For the Opposite Parties : Ms. J.Sahoo, A.S.C.

P R E S E N T:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing: 24.06.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 24.06.2025

J UDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--

1. This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner (who was the petitioner in R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006) praying for quashing the final order dated 21.05.2015 passed in R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006 by the Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement, Odisha, Cuttack (O.P. No.1) on the ground that, his revision petition vide R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006 was dismissed by the Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement, Odisha, Cuttack (O.P. No.1) on dated 21.05.2015 only on the ground of non-submission of the corresponding Sabik records of the case land in order to show the flow of title of the case land.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned ASC for the State.

3. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, the engaged learned counsel did not provide the information to the Petitioner for collection of the corresponding Sabik records of the case land in order to file the same in R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006, for which, there was no fault on the part of the Petitioner in submitting the corresponding Sabik records of the case land.

4. According to the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the petitioner had a good case in the revision, but, the same has been dismissed only on a technical ground

due to non-submission of the corresponding Sabik records of the case land in order to show the flow of title of the case land.

But, the Petitioner is eagerly interested to file the corresponding Sabik records of the case land in order to establish his title on the same. For which, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted for quashing the impugned order and to remand the case of the Petitioner in order to give an opportunity of being heard to him for submission of documents on his behalf to establish his claim on the case land.

5. When, it appears from the impugned order that, the same has been passed by the O.P. No.1 on dated 21.05.2015 only on a technical ground i.e. only for non-submission of the corresponding Sabik Record of the case land, for which, there is justification under law for making interference with the same through this writ petition filed by the Petitioner, because, it is the settled propositions of law that, when courses of substantial justice and the law of technicalities are pitted against each other, the courses of substantial justice deserves to be preferred for no other reason, but only in order to comply the principles of natural justice and also in to order to avoid the multiplicity of litigations between the parties.

6. So, by applying the above propositions of law to this matter at hand, it is felt proper to interfere with the impugned order through this writ petition filed by the Petitioner.

7. In result, the writ petition filed by the Petitioner is allowed.

8. The impugned order dated 21.05.2015 passed by the Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement, Odisha, Cuttack (O.P. No.1) in R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006 is quashed.

9. The matter vide R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006 is remitted back to the Court of Additional Commissioner, Land Records Settlement, Cuttack-1 at Jajpur Town for deciding the same afresh as per law after giving opportunity of being heard to the Parties including the Petitioner and the petitioner is at liberty to furnish all the required documents to substantiate his claim before the Court of the learned Additional Commissioner, Land Records Settlement, Cuttack-1 at Jajpur Town in R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006.

10. The Additional Commissioner, Land Records Settlement, Cuttack-1 at Jajpur Town is directed to dispose of the R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006 as expeditiously as possible within a period of three months from the date of the communication of this order.

11. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the Additional Commissioner, Land Records Settlement, Cuttack-1 at Jajpur Town in R.P. No.1171 of 2006 on 10.07.2025 in order to receive the direction of the said commissioner relating to the further proceedings of that R.P. Case No.1171 of 2006.

12. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of finally.

13. Registry is directed to communicate this order immediately to the Additional Commissioner, Land Records Settlement, Cuttack-1 at Jajpur Town.

14. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted to the parties on proper application.

(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE High Court of Orissa, Cuttack 24.06.2025// Binayak Sahoo Jr. Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter