Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5984 Ori
Judgement Date : 18 June, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.3354 of 2024
Laxman Kumar Pradhan .... Appellant
Represented by Adv.-
Mr. S. Mallik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and .... Respondents
others Represented by Adv.-
Mr. Satyabrata Mohanthy,
(Additional Government Advocate)
CORAM:
JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
18.06.2025 Order No.
01. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to faultier a
learned Single Judge's judgment on the ground that longevity achieved
during the Independence has not been adverted to while construing
subject Rule that was promulgated under the provisions of the then
Government of India Act, 1935 and reprinted thereafter under the proviso
to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. This aspect is not adverted to
in the impugned judgment. A case thus is made out for admission.
2. Admit and issue notice.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate Sri Mohanty, on
request, accepts notice for the respondents. Appellant to make over a set of
papers to him immediately.
List week after next.
( Dixit Krishna Shripad ) Judge
( M.S. Sahoo ) Judge
Prasant
Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR SAHOO Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 18-Jun-2025 19:06:08
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!