Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 733 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.S.A. No.454 of 2023
Basanti Nanda ...... Appellant
Represented by
Mr. S.K.Mishra, Sr.Advocate
Mr.S.Paltasingh, Advocate
-Versus-
Sujata Mohapatra .... Respondent
Represented by
None
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
01.07.2025 Order No. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
04.
2. Notice on the respondent is held sufficient in view of his refusal of notice.
3. Heard Mr. S.K.Mishra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant.
4. Perused the impugned judgments.
5. Considering the submissions and the grounds raised, the second appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law.
"I) Whether the learned Courts below were correct in not accepting the boundary description of the property as mentioned in the sale deed for want of correction of the sale deed ?
II) Whether both the Courts below were correct in holding that the plaintiff had no cause of action to file the suit ?
III) Whether the First Appellate Court was correct in holding that the suit was bad for non-impletion of boundary tenant and the vendor of the plaintiff as parties to the suit ?
6. Call for the L.C.R.
7. List this matter for hearing in the week commencing 13th October, 2025.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Manoj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!